This guy is nuts. Typical lib.
WHO said that????
Well, I guess billyblytheclinton&hillary didn't check their morals at the door--since they obviously didn't HAVE any when they entered.
As or breaking the law and cheating...BBBWWWAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
Why would anyone want to kill an irrelevant nonentity?
I guess you'd have to understand "Dimocrat logic."
We don't need to kill leftists. They are killing their own in droves in abortion mills every day.
Delusions of grandeur.
He really thinks he's that important.
Why would Republicans want to kill something that is already dead?
Nice to see that behind the vast expanse of Begala's forehead lies a very, very, very small widdle brain.
}:-)4
Don't ya actually have to HAVE an idea before ya win?
Drunk, stupid, and self important is no way to go through life.
The Democrats are pathetic. The only thing they have going for them is that universities will pay them to brainwash our kids.
MIDI - I LOVE YOU MORE TODAY THAN YESTERDAY
Hey, Paul Begala, you Clymer toad
Hey, Paul Begala, youre some pantload
You still defend Bill with all your RAT buddies
You have such an ugly grin
DNAs dripping from your chin
Everydays a new day
the excuses flow
Your pals a rapist
you have got to know
But you still defend him just like all your RAT buddies
You have such an ugly grin
DNAs dripping from your chin
Your foreheads much bigger than yesterday
It will be bigger tomorrow
Your foreheads much bigger than yesterday
And Giapetto should have warned you
it will grow tomorrow
You are even lower than a slugs rear end
Bill is a criminal
please dont pretend
But you still defend him just like all your RAT buddies
You have such an ugly grin
DNAs dripping from your chin
Your foreheads much bigger than yesterday
It will be bigger tomorrow
Your foreheads much bigger than yesterday
And Giapetto should have warned you
it will grow tomorrow
Bump
Amazingly stupid. This guy really does not seem to know that:
Moron...
Keep these idiots talking! They do more damage to themselves everyday!
He says Iraq wasnt a threat? now. Where was he then.....
A few snippets I collected recently........
The Clinton Justice Department's allegation in a 1998 indictment (two months before the embassy bombings) against bin Laden, to wit: In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.
Top Clinton administration counterterrorism official Richard Clarkes assertions, based on intelligence reports in 1999, that Saddam had offered bin Laden asylum after the embassy bombings, and Clarkes memo to then-National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, advising him not to fly U-2 missions against bin Laden in Afghanistan because he might be tipped off by Pakistani Intelligence, and [a]rmed with that knowledge, old wily Usama will likely boogie to Baghdad? (See 9/11 Commission Final Report, p. 134 & n.135.)
The continued insistence of high-ranking Clinton administration officials to the 9/11 Commission that the 1998 retaliatory strikes (after the embassy bombings) against a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory were justified because the factory was a chemical weapons hub tied to Iraq and bin Laden.
The continued insistence of high-ranking Clinton administration officials to the 9/11 Commission that the 1998 retaliatory strikes (after the embassy bombings) against a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory were justified because the factory was a chemical weapons hub tied to Iraq and bin Laden.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
".....Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, Chris Dodd,
John Kerry, John Edwards, Joe Biden and Jay Rockefeller voted
for the October 11, 2002 congressional joint resolution
authorizing the president, on his discretion, to go to war.
Here, in part, is what the resolution said:
"Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing
responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens
and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September
11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq:
"Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international
terroist organizations, including organizations that threaten
the lives and safety of United States citizens;
"Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001,
underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition
of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist
organizations ...
It is always entertaining to view the latest lib twist on hysteria...
As if we thought he were that important...
If you really want the federal government to have all of your money that badly, just hand it in.
Seriously, it's quite simple. All you need to do is write out a check for any amount of your money you chose, make the check payable to "The United States Treasury" and mail it to the IRS. Nobody will stop you, you don't have to wait until your taxes are raised, and the IRS will take it.
Begala is a loon, no doubt about it.
"I was driving past the Pentagon when that plane hit" on Sept. 11, 2001. "I had friends on that plane; this is deadly serious to me," Begala said.