Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Jovial Cad

It creeps me out that he was the lone opponent.

Does that mean that every other Senator had some kind of pork interest in this bill???


43 posted on 07/15/2005 7:27:05 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMan55
Kinda creeped me out, too. But what typically happens with bills like this, from what I've seen, is that the sponsors of the legislation aim it at something everyone generally agrees with--Homeland Security in this instance--and then load it up with all sorts of pork goodies. It makes it hard for a Senator to vote against it, because if he/she does, opponents back home can scream "he's against national security!".

But Senator Coburn has the guts to vote against something he knows is wrong, even if it causes him grief from political opponents. I'll bet this bill, if one examined it in depth, has a ton of garbage in it that has little or nothing to do with securing the border, or Homeland Security. Just my guess.

46 posted on 07/15/2005 7:35:50 AM PDT by A Jovial Cad ("A man's character is his fate." - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson