Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newgeezer
"Neglect" is a legal term of art, referring to the failure of a custodial parent to provide for the health, safety, and morals of a child. Since the father here was non-custodial, by definition he could not have been neglectful.

If you want to lament that he was non-custodial, I'll join you , with the caveat that we don't know for sure that he was the one who chose to remain non-custodial. Just as possible was that the girl's mother didn't allow him to take an active role in his daughter's life. It happens, especially in this "hook-up" culture.

8 posted on 07/15/2005 6:45:25 AM PDT by jude24 ("Stupid" isn't illegal - but it should be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: jude24
Just as possible was that the girl's mother didn't allow him to take an active role in his daughter's life. It happens, especially in this "hook-up" culture.

Sure. Which is why it's EVIL to make babies you can't nurture and protect. Some of them end up dead. The dad should feel guilty. He set the whole chain in motion when he unzipped his pants.

9 posted on 07/15/2005 6:57:16 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: jude24
"Neglect" is a legal term of art

Don't be ridiculous. No one's suggesting Christie violated civil law. But, in the practical sense of the term, he was neglectful.

Everything he said in the quote is true. It seems he understands; he 'gets' it.

10 posted on 07/15/2005 6:58:50 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson