Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000
Pressed to explain its statements of two years ago that Rove wasn't involved in the leak, the White House refused to do so this week.

Well if you believe this AP story and the NYT version of the same events you would have to conclude that Rove wasn't involved in the leak. Unless talking to reporters and telling them what other reporters are saying is a crime or even an ethical breach. This is the biggest pile of crap since Dan Rather tried to ... you know the story.

31 posted on 07/14/2005 9:38:23 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint
Unless talking to reporters and telling them what other reporters are saying is a crime or even an ethical breach.

"then informally discussed the information with a Time magazine reporter days before the story broke".

If this is correct, he shouldn't have done that.

Unfortunate for him, and others now, "informally" doesn't work here, and has created predictable results.

57 posted on 07/14/2005 9:52:50 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson