Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove Reportedly Held Phone Talk on C.I.A. Officer
NY Times ^ | July, 15, 2005 | DAVID JOHNSTON

Posted on 07/14/2005 8:27:58 PM PDT by freedrudge

Rove Reportedly Held Phone Talk on C.I.A. Officer

WASHINGTON, July 14 - Karl Rove, the White House senior adviser, spoke with the columnist Robert D. Novak as he was preparing an article in July 2003 that identified a C.I.A. officer who was undercover, someone who has been officially briefed on the matter said Thursday. Skip to next paragraph Multimedia Graphic The White House on the Leak Related White House Quotes on the C.I.A. Leak Case (July 11, 2005) At Leak Inquiry's Center, a Circumspect Columnist (Dec. 31, 2004)

Wilson: What I Didn't Find in Africa (July 6, 2003)

Mr. Rove has told investigators that he learned from the columnist the name of the C.I.A. officer, who was referred to by her maiden name, Valerie Plame, and the circumstances in which her husband, former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, traveled to Africa to investigate possible uranium sales to Iraq, the person said.

After hearing Mr. Novak's account, the person who has been briefed on the matter said, Mr. Rove told the columnist: "I heard that, too."

The previously undisclosed telephone conversation, which took place on July 8, 2003, was initiated by Mr. Novak, the person who has been briefed on the matter said.

Six days later, Mr. Novak's syndicated column reported that two senior administration officials had told him that Mr. Wilson's "wife had suggested sending him" to Africa. That column was the first instance in which Ms. Wilson was publicly identified as a C.I.A. operative. The column provoked angry demands for an investigation into who disclosed Ms. Wilson's name to Mr. Novak.

The Justice Department appointed Patrick J. Fitzgerald, a top federal prosecutor in Chicago, to lead the inquiry. Mr. Rove said in an interview last year that he did not know the C.I.A. officer's name and did no

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; rove; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last
To: Azzurri
This article vindicates Rove.

I was wondering if I was the only one thinking this.

21 posted on 07/14/2005 8:37:40 PM PDT by Carling (I am a Rovian plant - look out behind that tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
Exactly, but the defeated NYT writes in a way to take this vindication away.
22 posted on 07/14/2005 8:37:46 PM PDT by jveritas (The left cannot win a national election ever again and never will the Buchananites and 3rd parties)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge

It looks like Wilson's admission tonight on CNN has upstaged the NY Time's supposed scoop.


23 posted on 07/14/2005 8:37:47 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge

too bad "Good Ole Mr. Wilson" blew the whole "convert wife" crap on Wolf Blitzer tonight!

Dooah!


24 posted on 07/14/2005 8:37:57 PM PDT by macsmind76 (Macsmind.blogspot.com - Thou Shalt Not Get Away with It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor
Still no cigar. The closer you get in time to Novak's column with Rove only acknowledging INFORMATION PRESENTED TO HIM BY THE MEDIA, the better this whole picture looks. I still think there is some chance that Novak's original source was someone formerly in the administration, maybe even someone formerly in the CIA (and not necessarily during Bush's administration).

I sort of like this information - it does nothing to worsen the situation for Rove - but you can bet that Ted Kennedy, et. al. will be apoplectic over the weekend with this. Go ahead and make my day Ted. Collapse on the floor of the Senate while exuding gaseous vapors.

25 posted on 07/14/2005 8:38:00 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, but never in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Is this all they've got? Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!! Some scoop!!!!

.

Pres. Bush & his White House Officials looked very worried earlier today. BWAHAHAHA! No wonder this is a friday story. It vidicates Rove!

26 posted on 07/14/2005 8:38:08 PM PDT by PilloryHillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge
"Karl Rove, the White House senior adviser, spoke with the columnist Robert D. Novak as he was preparing an article in July 2003 that identified a C.I.A. officer who was undercover"

Take that and compare it with Wilson admitting on Wolf Blitzer tonight that she was not undercover when the Novak article was written and you have a repudiated story. Talk about splitting hairs
27 posted on 07/14/2005 8:38:47 PM PDT by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macsmind76

Joe Wilson is a wrong way charlie. He just can't help making himself look like an ass no matter what he tries to do. Maybe he should try fading away.


28 posted on 07/14/2005 8:39:50 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

It's sounds like all roads lead to Miller to me.


29 posted on 07/14/2005 8:39:59 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge

All this does is bolster the story that Rove's lawyer put out before - that Rove wasn't actively shopping Valorie Plame's name about and that in fact, he didn't even know anything other than the fact that he was Wilson's wife. This whole thing is absurd. The prosecuter's report which should completly absolve Rove can't come soon enough.


30 posted on 07/14/2005 8:40:08 PM PDT by Catphish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge

Prosecutor ought to subpeona this writer and tell these anonomous sources.


31 posted on 07/14/2005 8:40:36 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge
Here's the money quote:

The revelation of Mr. Rove's conversation with Mr. Novak raises a question the White House has never addressed: whether Mr. Rove ever described that conversation, or his conversation with Mr. Cooper, with the president.

This is what the left is aiming for. This whole thing has been orchestrated with this goal in mind, to tie President Bush himself into it.

32 posted on 07/14/2005 8:40:37 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spyone

i think he should keep running his fat mouth, cause when the shoes drops it is going to drop on him.


33 posted on 07/14/2005 8:41:04 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge

Do they really think they're going to be able to use this story as a stepping stone to derailing President Bush's second term? This story's taken so many Byzantine twists and turns and double-backs upon itself that even people who follow it closely are getting a headache! Average people who aren't political junkies are just going to throw up their hands in frustration.


34 posted on 07/14/2005 8:41:21 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge

lovely misleading headline for an article. It sounds like he was talking about Valerie in a conference call.

Instead, this seems to suggest that Novak told Rove about Plame working in the CIA, and about how Plame got Wilson the gig.

This would explain why Rove would think there was nothing wrong with mentioning it in passing to another reporter later. If you learned something from a reporter, you wouldn't think it was a secret.


35 posted on 07/14/2005 8:41:31 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge
 

 

 
"The person who provided the information about Mr. Rove's conversation with Mr. Novak declined to be identified, citing requests by Mr. Fitzgerald that no one discuss the case."

  Anyone else see the humor in that statement?

 

 

 

 

36 posted on 07/14/2005 8:41:54 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results is the definition of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

Can anyone explain to me why Novak hasn't been supeoned?


37 posted on 07/14/2005 8:42:24 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell; Howlin; Dog; Mo1; Fedora; piasa; cyncooper

"The conversation between Mr. Novak and Mr. Rove seemed almost certain to intensify the question about whether one of Mr. Bush's closest political advisers play"

This is hilarious! How the NYT tells its readers to think opposite of the information given!

What the article intensifies is who is the "not a partisan gunslinger" and who the reporters who told Rove are! Judith Miller?


38 posted on 07/14/2005 8:42:32 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedrudge
All of that liberal Democrat, Crazy Joe sourced, "Rove leaked it to Novak" BS has now been throughly discredited. How can you leak something that is ALREADY KNOWN?

Since the Democrats rely on hysterical rhetoric, why EVER take them seriously?

39 posted on 07/14/2005 8:44:10 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Support Our Troops, Spit On A Liberal Reporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

"Here's the money quote:

The revelation of Mr. Rove's conversation with Mr. Novak raises a question the White House has never addressed: whether Mr. Rove ever described that conversation, or his conversation with Mr. Cooper, with the president.

This is what the left is aiming for."

Yes, but doesn't the article undermine that aim? Rather than a selective leak it indicates reporters told Rove first (as they did with Libby).


40 posted on 07/14/2005 8:44:17 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson