To: hershey
There would be an alternative Internet in the works instantly. Americans will never be subjected to the UN authority in any way. That just isn't going to happen, it's a liberal socialist dream that the people of this country will not tolerate. We would just setup our own system and let the other one wither and die.
18 posted on
07/14/2005 6:09:10 PM PDT by
oldenuff2no
(Proud Nam Vet)
To: oldenuff2no
"We would just setup our own system and let the other one wither and die."
Nope, because then Congress would start getting involved to "protect the children." Pretty soon everything would be back in government hands. Once it gets there, they never let it go.
Witness cable tv and satellite radio. There are plenty here and in Congress who want to control both now, even though they are both 100% private and voluntary.
22 posted on
07/14/2005 6:12:54 PM PDT by
LibertarianInExile
("Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist." -- John Adams. "F that." -- SCOTUS, in Kelo.)
To: oldenuff2no
There would be an alternative Internet in the works instantly. Americans will never be subjected to the UN authority in any way. That just isn't going to happen, it's a liberal socialist dream that the people of this country will not tolerate. We would just setup our own system and let the other one wither and die. Just like we don't tolerate unsecured borders, oppressive taxes, anti-smoking lunacy, judicial activism, non-responsive legislators, treasonous national media, a million + abortions/year, environmental regulations based on junk science, idealogues entrenched in institutions of higher learning, and the compromise of property rights. That's just off the top of my head.
Buh-uh-uh-utttttt, the UN taking over the Internet, that's the line they dare not cross. Right.
49 posted on
07/15/2005 5:22:27 AM PDT by
olde north church
(Mithra, the ORIGINAL Son sent to Earth for the salvation of man.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson