Students Tap New Vein of Gay Issue

LA Times ^ | 15 July 2005 | Steven Bodzin

[staterightsfirst]

This is ridiculous. The issue with blood isn't with the people who identify themselves as 'gay,' the problem is with those who participate in risky behavior.

Men who have sex with men, injection drug users, people who are involved with/have participated in commercial sex are all subgroups of the population that have MUCH higher AIDS/HIV prevalence than the rest of the population. Therefore, we don't use their blood. However, a legitimately abstinent gay man can give blood. So all these people need to calm down and shut up. It's not what you are that disqualifies you, it's what you do.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

People who disagree with this policy should set up their own blood banks, and offer patients a choice. Liberal patients would be free to back up their blather with a decision to take the other kind of blood.

Exactly!

[Echo Talon]

WOW! 8 Kids? Whew! I thought my Mom was busy with 4 of us growing up. Yea im feeling ok, meds keep everything A-ok.

[trebb]

I got back from Italy in July of 1980; the cutoff for donating bllod is June of 1980. 26 years with no mad cow symptoms and I can't donate blood because I missed the deadline by about 2 weeks.

[bboop]

The winner is NOT the public.

[SaveTheChief]

So let me see if I get this straight. Students, who are all so wise, are making the tainting of the blood supply a civil rights issue?

[Little Bill]

What about those that check line 30 on Mass Form 1, to pay at the 5.8% tax rate, rather than the lower 5.3 rate. Neither John F'n nor fat boy seem to do that.

[Tax-chick]

I'm glad you're doing well. Worse than not being able to donate blood would be needing transfusions!

[Lorianne]

Lots of people are not allowed to give blood, including those who have travelled to certain countries. Are they discriminating against travellers?

[little jeremiah]

later pingout.

[Echo Talon]

Yea, I don't need a blood transfusion! LOL never had one of those thank God.

[Trillian]

This is yet another battle the homos are going to lose.
Engage in risky and deadly behavior, deal with the consequences.

[Tax-chick]

Are they discriminating against travellers?

Yes, of course they are, just as they're discriminating against men who have sex with other men, illegal drug users, pregnant women, and people with anemia. And good on 'em!

[A. Pole]

The college activism has been centered in New England.

No surprise here. As the main stream descendants of the Puritans - the United Church of Christ is moving to embrace the sexual deviations - their religious zeal and strictness will see the risk of contaminated blood as pious sacrifice on the altar of Political Correctness. The more havoc the more certitude of election.

[Onelifetogive]

and this fall we'll be working on reorganizing our precinct (once I get over the nausea :-).

A lot of Dimocrats in your precinct, I suppose.....

[Tax-chick]

It looks like we're about 50-50, but it's a newly independent precinct, split off from the next one over because of new housing developments.

[Tax-chick]

Oh, now I get it. I'm a little slow this evening :-).

[A. Pole]

Why should a high risk group WANT to donate blood? Do you want to kill other people?

For the sake of sensitivity and diversity. Let the whole society suffer so the perfect world is a little closer.

[scripter]

Related article here: Gay men should be able to donate blood, students say College group pressures Red Cross.

Somebody said they should start their own blood bank... and call it the Lavender Cross....

[ican'tbelieveit]

Yeap. Some people just won't look at the bigger picture and what is better for society as a whole. It is all about their feelings.