As usual, News.com doesn't post original documents so we can read for ourselves. However, I'm sure Kimball saw both before he gave his "Despite the vast disparity between SCO's public accusations and its actual evidence--or complete lack thereof..." statment.
Also, you have to remember that Groklaw is generally document- and court action-based. When something pops up, it's usually on Groklaw first. It was unsealed, she posted, then SCO had its response later.
BUT, if you notice, Groklaw has it up in bold print on the front page that there are two updates to the story, and includes the CNET coverage of SCO's response.
You try to discredit Groklaw by claiming it only shows news favorable to the editor's viewpoint. Sorry GE, wrong as usual.