Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China ‘ready to use N-weapons against US’
Financial Times ^ | July 14 2005 | Alexandra Harney

Posted on 07/14/2005 2:39:38 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 next last
To: SampleMan; Jeff Head
Do you know ho many SLICMs and SLIRBMs the Chinese have? Here's a hint, you can count them on one hand and have three fingers left over. If you go for the number that are reported operational, you'll have five fingers left over. At any rate, these aren't survivable against US SSNs.

Lord, where's Jeff Head when you need him?

Hey Jeff, China ain't no Dragon, she's just a pussycat!

141 posted on 07/14/2005 5:11:35 PM PDT by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Jackknife
I had 3 threads up in my Firefox....Posted that reply on the wrong thread!

Good to hear. You had me thrown for a loop. hehe.

142 posted on 07/14/2005 5:13:22 PM PDT by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

You assume far too much about what the PRC's actual inventories really are. It is in their best interest for us to believe that their capabilities are lower than they actually are. We have far less access (both legit and covert) to do assessment than we did even during the worst days with the Soviets. It is an interesting thing. Whereas, I can (as I have done several times), of course with the appropriate visa, step off a plane in HK with almost no hassle, get on a ferry and step onto the soil of Guangdong Province at Shekou, grab a cab and go to visit certain factories in Dongguan, with no escort, the heck if I could ever get anywhere near where the nukes are deployed, built, conceived, hidden or whatever. It's a two tier system - openness in the SARs and a complete lockdown in vast "sensitive areas." Without a serious level of penetration by our intel assets, and, even more importantly, massive local recruiting of native assets, we've got no real info. The CIA have openly admitted their underfunding of PRC ops.


143 posted on 07/14/2005 5:22:18 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
Re #17

Such nice words from peacc-loving victims of belligerent U.S., who insists that they are "not so strong." :-)

144 posted on 07/14/2005 5:23:08 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

They are extremely nationalistic, with almost bellicose fervor and extremism, with a total disguise with the west, and especially with the United States. They are willing, able and prepared to conduct a first strike against the United States, all it would take is a return of one their hardline Marxist waiting in the wings for the opportunity to seize power. They are aggressively developing a blue water naval capability and are increasing aggressive with other nations in the region. Japan, Philippines, Taiwan, and are making aggressive yet weak territorial claims in the region, with the lightly veiled threat of force if they are opposed. They have little if any regard for human life or rights, so they do not have a burdening humanity, morality or conscience to weigh the consequences of their actions. Mutually assured destruction is not a deterrent to them. One must remember who taught, supported and guided the North Koreans.


145 posted on 07/14/2005 5:25:01 PM PDT by FFIGHTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Kind of like the difference between a Howard Dean house party and a smoker at the Clinton headquarters.

One is for the gullible useful idiots, the other is
a cadre meeting.


146 posted on 07/14/2005 5:26:32 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Fine. Let them. I've always wondered what 1.2 billion glowing Chinese would look like. I wonder if it comes with egg rolls.


147 posted on 07/14/2005 5:27:22 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Right now I can't decide which political party is trying to commit suicide faster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots

If only it was just trade. We've located all sorts of factories for US designed products there. In order to build a product, you need bills of material, assembly instructions, drawings and specs for all the parts, test software, fault trees for trouble shooting, and knowledgeable locals who understand the product deeply enough to be able to keep things running when is dark O'clock here in the states. In other words, you essentially need to give the Chinese who are running the plant the crown jewells. OF course, reverse engineering it all is a no brainer. We're not just talking cheap fans and christmas lights. We're talking jet engines, mainframe computer parts (the parts, of course, make up the whole), disk drives, lasers, and all but the highest end of the highest end stuff. Even for things that are proscribed by Export Control lists you can get exemptions. Plus, the gov ain't got diddly for enforcement or auditing so violations are happening, undiscovered, left and right. But it gets worse....

These days, the new fad is R&D in China. You see, of course, it is much cheaper to hire a new grad MSEE or PhD from a PRC university than one here in the states going to school on an F1 visa. Plus, if you set up a design center over there, when you hire, there will be no Feds poking around making sure that you created export control agreement with them or that they aren't active duty PLA. In fact, since they will be the ones doing the designing, on CAD tools located there, modelling it on mainframes located there (some of them not even American ones, but Chinese or Russian ones) and what not, there really is no concept of export control of the intellectual property. Because it WAS already exported the moment it was created! Imagine it all, US corporations funding the immediate creation of advanced intellectual property in the PRC!

In the most "advanced" incarnation of this model, you lay off most of the techies in the states, or at very least, completely overload them. That way, what you end up with is a situation where the only guy who really knows and understands the design is a Red Communist - who may well be active PLA. Cool, eh?


148 posted on 07/14/2005 5:36:18 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
You must be one of Wal-Marts retail competitors who BTW all Wal-Mart competitors also buy all their products from FLIPPIN China! Before china it was Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, India, Sri Lanka, pick a third world country or cheap labor country, ie., get a clue already.

Wal-Mart was mentioned simply as an exemplification of the problem. Of course we would need to stop buying all Chinese goods, how hard is that to understand? I don't recall that Thailand, India, Japan, et. al. have raised the possibility of nuclear war...or do I still not have a "clue"?
149 posted on 07/14/2005 5:36:49 PM PDT by RetroSexual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yep!


150 posted on 07/14/2005 5:37:15 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

Consider me..."Irritated".

:-)


151 posted on 07/14/2005 5:42:41 PM PDT by JediForce (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
Worse than the worst days of the Cold War???? I think that's a tremendous stretch. Are you suggesting that we could walk around inside of the Soviet Union? When it comes to the number of ICBMs, submarines, and other large weapon systems, I don't think that there are any big mysteries.

Building ships, constructing very large missiles, and deploying both are very hard if not impossible to conceal to overhead imagery.

I'm not for discounting the Chinese, but I'm not prone to give them invincible status either.

If the question is whether we can stop a PLAA/PLAAN invasion of Taiwan conventionally, the answer is, "Yes." If the question is whether the Chinese would fair well in a nuclear exchange with us, the answer is, "No."
152 posted on 07/14/2005 5:58:14 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: houeto
Hey Jeff, China ain't no Dragon, she's just a pussycat!

The only Type 094 SSBN was launched in December and isn't yet declared operational. The Xia, which it replaced, was also a single unit and was taken off of operational status. The JL-2 missile has a 4500 mile range, which requires significant travel to hit the US. Very perilous with every US SSN looking for you as you leave port. Is this supposed to make us quiver when the Chinese rattle their sabres?

153 posted on 07/14/2005 6:06:59 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Generally speaking, someday means someday, not never. But you have to fight with what you have, and right now the Chinese don't have it.


154 posted on 07/14/2005 6:08:23 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

No of course we could not walk around in the USSR. But we had more access then, than we do now with the PRC. Even beyond their Communist systems, the Chinese are innately the most secretive nation on Earth. They've been that way for a very long time.

Building missiles is not all that hard to conceal. They are built indoors, not in open shipyards. It is even easier to conceal it if you don't final assemble them and instead, kit the parts. They can be assembled rapidly, using demand flow manufacturing (e.g. Kanban system). Pardon the pun, but it's not rocket science.


155 posted on 07/14/2005 6:09:27 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

More telltales than you think on missile production and deployment.

There won't be any overnight fielding of 500 ICBMs.

I'm not dismissing the Chinese, but I don't give them mythical abilities either.


156 posted on 07/14/2005 6:21:34 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Generally speaking, someday means someday, not never. But you have to fight with what you have, and right now the Chinese don't have it.

Thanks for your posts Sampleman.

The only point of my posts has to do with our ignorant asses granting the enemy MFN status. By doing so we gave them a 'credit card' with a limit beyond their wildest imaginations (which are evil).

MFN status needs to be repealed now or within 15-20 years (at the most) we'll be dealing with an entirely different animal.

157 posted on 07/14/2005 6:21:44 PM PDT by houeto ("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: houeto
Concur. Totalitarian states should never receive MFN status.
158 posted on 07/14/2005 6:26:15 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
So the Chinese have about 400 nukes to our more than 10,000?
Oh, and they're all targeted at blue states...

There are no red or blue states... there are only shades of purple you insensitive lout!

159 posted on 07/14/2005 6:29:33 PM PDT by streetpreacher (If at the end of the day, 100% of both sides are not angry with me, I've failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
We can end 5000 years of chopsticks in 30 minutes.

30 minutes, yes, if we use the land-based ICBM leg of our nuclear triad. Less than 5 minutes if launching SLBM's from our submarines.

160 posted on 07/14/2005 6:33:14 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson