Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rutles4Ever

Makes sense, unless they only have 1, 2, or 3 weapons (which is much more likely than 40). Why waste them?


76 posted on 07/14/2005 12:49:45 PM PDT by nwctwx (Everything I need to know, I learned on the Threat Matrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: nwctwx
Why waste them?

Because they're being hounded left and right and the FBI could arrest them at any point and a nuke used is better for them than a nuke unused and wasted. There's no way Al Qaeda has nukes.

86 posted on 07/14/2005 12:52:39 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: nwctwx

Ok, I'd like to revise that. It is conceivable, if unlikely, that they could have obtained a device from Pakistan. But that (1) would be large and unwieldy (not a "suitcase") and (2) would be at most one bomb, not 20.


89 posted on 07/14/2005 12:54:00 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: nwctwx

The panic they could cause would almost be enough. So, using Occam's Razor as a gauge, why haven't they done this yet if they have them? Somewhere - anywhere? Talk about getting leverage.


97 posted on 07/14/2005 12:59:17 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson