To: Alter Kaker
You are in denial, dude!
When a group as dedicated as Al Queda has a will to do something, and it is possible to do it, it is only a matter of time until the group succeeds.
Your whole premise seems to be "Don't worry, they can't, because they haven't yet." Then you make the case for how difficult it is.
So what if (which may or may not be true) Al Qaeda only has one source, Pakistan? A. Q. Kahn's network is a pretty good source according to what I have read.
Although I like the idea of TSchmereL Center for Intelligence, there is not one. I am basing my argument on common sense.
I stand by my opinion that anyone who takes comfort in the thought that "Al Qaeda does not have a nuke because they have not nuked us yet" is a bigger fool than you.
Whether or not Al Qaeda has a nuke, this is the kind of wishful thinking that gives your enemies confidence.
358 posted on
07/15/2005 7:03:32 AM PDT by
TSchmereL
(This war is not nearly over yet.)
To: TSchmereL
When a group as dedicated as Al Queda has a will to do something, and it is possible to do it, it is only a matter of time until the group succeeds. Dedication? If dedication were all that was needed, you'd be speaking German.
A. Q. Kahn's network is a pretty good source according to what I have read.
Remind me again why A. Q. Khan isn't in Guantanamo? I understand limited mobility, under "house arrest" in a mansion in Islamabad can be pretty burdensome, but why hasn't your government done anything about him?
367 posted on
07/15/2005 9:21:52 AM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson