Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandy Berger's Sentencing Postponed
News Max ^ | July 13, 2005

Posted on 07/14/2005 9:05:05 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Sentencing for former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, who pleaded guilty in April to stealing and destroying top secret terrorism documents from the National Archives, has been delayed, NewsMax.com has learned.

Asked why Berger wasn't sentenced as scheduled on Friday, July 8, a Justice Department spokesman told NewsMax on Tuesday that Berger's sentencing has been postponed till September.

The spokesman declined to offer an explanation for the delay.

Repeated calls asking about the postponement to Berger's lawyer, Washington, D.C., attorney Lanny Breuer, went unreturned.

Federal District Court's U.S. Magistrate Deborah Robinson, who is presiding over the Berger case, also did not return a call inquiring about its disposition.

After Justice Department prosecutor Noel Hillman allowed Berger to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, he requested what some consider an extraordinarily light sentence given the gravity of the crime - a $10,000 fine, a three-year suspension of Berger's security clearance and no jail time.

The recommendation for leniency was in stark contrast with the comments of Deputy Attorney General James Comey, who suggested after the document theft story broke that Berger could be headed to jail.

"We take issues of classified information very, very seriously," Comey told reporters, before adding, "All felonies in the federal system bring with them the promise of jail time, that's all I can say about that."

Prosecutor Hillman's recommendation would still have to be approved by Magistrate Robinson, a prospect that is expected but not assured.

Under Justice Department guidelines, Berger's misdemeanor plea could still yield a $100,000 fine and a year in prison.

Since the announcement of Berger's light sentence, several online petitions have sprung up, urging Magistrate Robinson to impose a stiffer penalty.

It's not clear whether the delay in Berger's sentencing has anything to do with a reluctance on Robinson's part to accept Hillman's recommendation.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 200507; 20050708; 200509; berger; breuer; comey; debbierobinson; deborahrobinson; debrobinson; hillman; jamescomey; jimcomey; lannybreuer; nara; nationalarchives; noelhillman; robinson; sandyberger; sandyburger; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Sandy Berger: A Case for Accountability By Colbert I. King Saturday, July 24, 2004; Page A21

****Set aside Republican speculation that former Clinton national security adviser Samuel "Sandy" Berger was trying to hide classified information from the Sept. 11 commission or that he had provided the material to the Kerry campaign. Do likewise with Democratic suspicions that the FBI's investigation of Berger was leaked to distract attention from the commission's report. Those concerns, all unproven, are partisan and secondary. Keep the focus where it belongs. Did Sandy Berger violate the rules regarding the protection of classified information entrusted to him, and if he did, will he be held accountable for his actions?

That's the key test for Washington.

Sandy Berger is a prominent figure among the nation's foreign policy elite. He has friends everywhere, especially where it counts: on Capitol Hill and in the Democratic administration-in-exile holed up in D.C. think tanks and on K Street. He occupies a place of honor in high political circles and among opinion-makers in the press. And he's got clout. Immediately following disclosure about him and the missing National Archives documents, Bill Clinton and John Kerry put in a good word for their friend. And it wasn't for nothing that Berger received this sympathetic characterization in a Post story on Wednesday: "At the same time," wrote our reporter, "[Berger] was known as someone who would constantly lose track of papers or appointments without subordinates to keep him organized and on schedule. 'For all those who know and love him, it's easy to see how this could happen,' one former Clinton colleague said."

A regular Mr. Magoo, that Sandy Berger. ………………………………….***

1 posted on 07/14/2005 9:05:05 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

hmmmm...............


2 posted on 07/14/2005 9:07:15 AM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

vs

MEDIA ADVISORY:
SCHUMER STANDS WITH AMBASSADOR JOE WILSON TO ASK FOR SUSPENSION OF ROVE'S SECURITY CLEARANCE

Thu Jul 14 2005 11:15:02 ET

White House Should Suspend Deputy Chief of Staff's Security Clearance Information While Investigation is Pending, Until Plame Leak Is Resolved

In Light Of Time Reporter Matt Cooper's Confirmation That Rove Was a Source In the Leak of CIA Agent Valerie Plame's Identity, Schumer and Wilson Call For Suspension of Rove's Security Clearance

U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer and Ambassador Joseph Wilson will hold a press conference at 3:00pm TODAY, July 14, 2005 in the Mansfield Room of the U.S. Capitol to call for the suspension of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove' security clearance until the investigation of the leak of CIA Agent Valerie Plame's identity is resolved.

Israel S. Klein
Communications Director
U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer


3 posted on 07/14/2005 9:08:39 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Evidently too many people are watching and will take notice of the slap on the wrist.

I wonder how CU's investigation of Ward Churchill is going?


4 posted on 07/14/2005 9:10:00 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Looks like the Left doesn't want any distractions from the opening debut of "Get Karl".


5 posted on 07/14/2005 9:10:54 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter for SCOTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm guessing the new date is September 2, the Friday before Labor Day, and probably in the late afternoon so they can broom thru an easy sentence and do it on a day no one is listening to the news or reading the papers.
6 posted on 07/14/2005 9:11:06 AM PDT by jackieaxe (English speaking, tax paying, law abiding citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is truely pathetic......


7 posted on 07/14/2005 9:11:24 AM PDT by logic ("All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Maybe this will give the FBI more time to turn Berger and get him to rat out Clinton (who almost certainly was the puppeteer behind the incident)...


8 posted on 07/14/2005 9:12:20 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

Yes. I wonder.


9 posted on 07/14/2005 9:12:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Hey, this was in all the newspapers. And didn't you see the anchors on the morning talk shows, asking commentators their opinion on Sandy Berger? Yeah, right.


10 posted on 07/14/2005 9:12:58 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This stinks.


11 posted on 07/14/2005 9:13:04 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Just curious...but did they close Sandy's security clearance after this little episode of his? I didn't think they did but was wondering.


12 posted on 07/14/2005 9:14:06 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This stinks.


13 posted on 07/14/2005 9:15:07 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
it amazes that rove is the focus of the msm fags, while a man who stole and destroyed classified documents is a non-issue as far as they go.


what a joke the msm is.
14 posted on 07/14/2005 9:16:35 AM PDT by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Just checked.

Not one story listed on Yahoo.

Google only lists News Max and Conservative Voice - Media Buy-Ass for Donkeys - as having a story.

15 posted on 07/14/2005 9:17:38 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I've studied the applicable statutes (you see, I have a clearance and know a bit about it because part of the process of getting a clearance includes being briefed on the proper procedures for handling classified materials, the penalties for mishandling classified materials and acknowledging in writing that you've been briefed on this.)

And a post in my weblog contains an analysis of why I don't think the portion of the laws about mishandling classified documents that are punishable as a misdemeanor can be applied to Sandy Berger. In fact, I think that he ought to qualify under a section that has much, much stiffer penalties.

16 posted on 07/14/2005 9:18:06 AM PDT by Yanni.Znaio (This tagline is political. The FEC is trying to make me remove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Message: "Let's see how that little Rove matter progresses before we make a final determination on Mr. Lumpy-Pants."


17 posted on 07/14/2005 9:18:17 AM PDT by Socratic (Liberal's motto: Capio ergo sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

ping--just suppose his name was Karl Rove.


18 posted on 07/14/2005 9:18:54 AM PDT by Temple Owl (19064)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Berger was known as someone who would constantly lose track of papers

Yeah ... often he would discover memos and other paperwork in his undies and socks when he got ready for bed.

19 posted on 07/14/2005 9:18:58 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yanni.Znaio
.............. I think that he ought to qualify under a section that has much, much stiffer penalties.

I have little trouble believing that!

20 posted on 07/14/2005 9:19:23 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson