Replies

When asked if you're the one who was sorry he didn't go into the porn business, you said you were.

Now you say you're not sorry.

I assume you've heard of the term "mixed feelings," right?

You're so intent that everyone except you is wrong about everything, all the time,

Not at all.

"When asked if you're the one who was sorry he didn't go into the porn business, you said you were.

Now you say you're not sorry.

"I assume you've heard of the term "mixed feelings," right? "

Right. Mixed feelings. Yeah, I understand what you mean. Feeling sometimes that you should have been a pornographer after all. It still pulls at you sometimes.

The motivations for a man to become pornographers is well known. Sure, there's always money - but there are plenty of other ways to make money. I'm talking about what specifically drives him into producing porn. It's all about making his fantasies about how women should act - and how they should be treated - come to life. Women performing any sexual fantasy he wants from them, on his command. Not that they'd do that for him anyway - after all, he has to (how shall I say this?) pay them to do it. And the women doing nothing spontaneously, or just because they want to. No. Just mechanically going though the motions of a script he has devised, and dictates to them, at his whim. They might as well be robots. Indeed, all the desires of the porn-producing man point to this. It's all to feed his need to reduce women to little sex robots. Because, at the bottom line, a thinking independent woman simply stumps him. She's over his head and out of his league.

Guys like this might even express the desire for a "robotic girlfriend". Who knows?

(modernman's inexact quoting of me is in green.) "You're so intent that everyone except you is wrong about everything, all the time, "

"Not at all."

It's easy to quote a fragment of a statement rather than the complete statement to intentionally create the false impression that the subject of discussion was different from what was actually under discussion. I won't do that to you. Not out of respect for you, but out of respect for honesty. Also I have no compulsion to distort, since I have no hatred and aversion to truth. Nor is distortion such an ingrained part of my very being that I'd do it automatically, like you do, every time.

That said, let's restore my complete statement as made, as it stood before your intentional attempt to destroy context and distort meaning. And see what we learn.
--------------------------------
(the restored section is in red italics. Modernman's complete response is in black italics.)

"You're so intent that everyone except you is wrong about everything, all the time, that you simply rush in and dispute whatever's said to you. Without ever thinking that with everything you say, you completely contradict yourself. Every single time."

"Not at all."
-----------------------------------------

The subject under discussion was how over the last few posts, all you have left in you is to give an "is not" response to anything said to you. "No it isn't" "no I'm not" "only in your mind", "not at all", etc. Guess what? The above section shows you did it again. Even with your typically deceptive attempt to make it look like something else was under discussion - you did it again. And do you what to know what you're going to do next? You're going to do it again.

Hey! I just figured out who you might be! I think you're John Cleese, and you've come here to perform that classic Monty Python "Argument" sketch" for us!

Anyway, thanks for giving us ever more insights into how hate-filled South-bashers must force their minds to work, in order to espouse the views they do.