Posted on 07/13/2005 8:21:43 PM PDT by kcvl
The way I read it is the Judge is weighing the deal that was made and the crime committed and has an option to reject it outright or may go ahead and accept it and mete out punishment as recommended by the prosecutors or perform a variation of their own.
Oh, Dear Lord! What insanity!!
lmao.....thanks for the laugh.
It's not just you.........
Seeing those nasty reporters on TV, made me ill. John Roberts, David Gregory........and their nastiness do nothing but show the American people how biased they are.
Apparently, Dan Rather has a "super top secret" training camp somewhere. Since Rove ran them out of Texas, I'd guess Alexandria as their new home base.
Could someone check on the "frequency"?
I wouldn't believe Harold said, his dear Uncle his up to his ankles in fraud.
re the 'berglars' sentence:
I believe the hearing is delayed, but haven't heard hardly anything lately.
A $10,000 fine was mentioned a lot earlier. Seems like a loose-noose would be more appropiate!
I like your guess of Dan i'd(Rather)lie running a "terroreporterist" training camp...
er..... I mean a "super top secret" training camp!
Humans leak.
< (Actually, Wilson was right about the bogus Niger uranium tale, and the White House was wrong, although his credibility did take a hit from a critical Senate intelligence committee report.)
Once his credibility was "hit" the committee needed to pack its bags. After that how can anything he says be credible?
Even in a court case, jurors are instructed that if you feel someone has lied on one point, you can discount "anything" else they said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.