Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr.Zoidberg
Somehow, I just don't think Jessica Simpson will quite be able to fill out Catherine Bach's "Daisy Dukes."

get your eyes checked

62 posted on 07/14/2005 6:56:41 AM PDT by Tiger Smack (www.tigersmack.com <------- for LSU & SEC sports/news/stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Tiger Smack

Classy Sexy vs Trashy Sexy.

Catherine Bach's portrayed a sexy woman who you put a ring on her finger.


Jessica Simpson, per her video portrayal, is just someone you promise to call sometime, whenever, maybe.


63 posted on 07/14/2005 7:01:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: Tiger Smack

Jessica looks better in shorts than most actresses. I don't think she is quite as pretty in the face as Bach tho.


64 posted on 07/14/2005 7:03:07 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: Tiger Smack
My eyes are fine Tiger, thanks.

Catherine Bach was able to be sexy without making me want to ask if she's had an AIDS test in the past 2 weeks. Catherine presented the character as someone you could actually take to church without half the congregation (the male half) knowing if she was a natural blonde from previous experience.

Jessica Simpsom 'may' be as wholesome as granola, but Daisy Duke(and the shorts she wears) she isn't.
68 posted on 07/14/2005 9:57:08 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Join islam, see the world. Blow up unrepentant infidels. Uncle Bin Laden wants you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson