Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mission Implausible ... Ann Coulter
World Net Daily ^ | 13 July 2005 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:39 PM PDT by Rummyfan

Karl Rove was right. The real story about Joseph C. Wilson IV was not that Bush lied about Saddam seeking uranium in Africa; the story was Clown Wilson and his paper-pusher wife, Valerie Plame. By foisting their fantasies of themselves on the country, these two have instigated a massive criminal investigation, the result of which is: The only person who has demonstrably lied and possibly broken the law is Joseph Wilson.

So the obvious solution is to fire Karl Rove.

Clown Wilson thrust himself on the nation in July 2003 when he wrote an op-ed for the New York Times claiming Bush had lied in his State of the Union address. He said Bush was referring to Wilson's own "report" when Bush said: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

But that is not what Wilson says he found! Thus, his column had the laughably hubristic title, "What I Didn't Find in Africa." (Once I couldn't find my car for hours after a Dead show. I call the experience: "What I Didn't Find in San Francisco.")

Driven by that weird obsession liberals have of pretending they are Republicans in order to attack Republicans, Wilson implied he had been sent to Niger by Vice President Dick Cheney. Among copious other references to Cheney in the op-ed, Wilson said that CIA "officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story" that Saddam Hussein had attempted to buy uranium from Niger, "so they could provide a response to the vice president's office."

Soon Clown Wilson was going around claiming: "The office of the vice president, I am absolutely convinced, received a very specific response to the question it asked, and that response was based upon my trip out there."

Dick Cheney responded by saying: "I don't know Joe Wilson. I've never met Joe Wilson. I don't know who sent Joe Wilson. He never submitted a report that I ever saw when he came back." Clown Wilson's allegation that Cheney had received his (unwritten) "report" was widely repeated as fact by, among others, the New York Times.

In a huffy editorial, the Times suggested there had been a "willful effort" by the Bush administration to slander the great and honorable statesman Saddam Hussein. As evidence, the Times cited Bush's claims about Saddam seeking uranium from Niger, which, the Times said, had been "pretty well discredited" – which, according to my copy of "The New York Times Stylebook" means "unequivocally corroborated" – "by Joseph Wilson 4th, a former American diplomat, after he was dispatched to Niger by the CIA to look into the issue."

So liberals were allowed to puff up Wilson's "report" by claiming Wilson was sent "by the CIA." But – in the traditional liberal definition of "criminal" – Republicans were not allowed to respond by pointing out Wilson was sent to Niger by his wife, not by the CIA and certainly not by Dick Cheney.

So important was Wilson's fact-finding mission to Niger that he wasn't paid and he produced no written report. It actually buttressed the case that Saddam had tried to buy uranium from Niger, though Wilson was too stupid to realize it. His conclusion is contradicted by the extensive findings of the British government. (I'm not sure, but I think that's what Bush may have been referring to when he said, "the British government.") One could write a book about what Joe Wilson doesn't know about Africa. In fact, I'm pretty sure someone did: Joe Wilson.

About a year later, a bipartisan Senate committee heard testimony from a CIA official that it was Wilson's wife who had "offered up" Wilson for the Niger trip. The committee also discovered a Feb. 12, 2002, memo from Wilson's wife gushing that her husband "has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines [not to mention lots of French contacts], both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity."

Wilson's response to the production of his wife's memo was: "I don't see it as a recommendation to send me."

Wilson's report was a hoax. His government bureaucrat wife wanted to get him out of the house, so she sent him on a taxpayer-funded government boondoggle.

That was the information Karl Rove was trying to convey to the media by telling them, as described in the notes of Time reporter Matt Cooper: "big warning"! Don't "get too far out on Wilson."

Democrats believe that because Wilson's wife worked at the CIA, the White House should not have been allowed to mention that it was she who sent him to Niger. But meanwhile, Clown Wilson was free to puff up his apocryphal credentials by implying he had been sent to Niger on an important mission for the vice president by the CIA.

Despite the colloquialism being used on TV to describe the relevant criminal offense, the law does not criminalize "revealing the name" of a covert operative. If it did, every introduction of an operative at a cocktail party or a neighborhood picnic would constitute a felony. "Revealing the name of" is shorthand to describe what the law does criminalize: Intentionally revealing a covert operative as a covert operative, knowing it will blow the operative's cover.

Rove had simply said Wilson went to Niger because of his wife, not his skill, expertise or common sense. It was the clown himself who outed his wife as an alleged "covert" agent by saying he was not recommended by his wife, and thus the White House must have been retaliating against him by mentioning his wife.

Wilson intentionally blew his wife's "cover" in order to lie about how he ended up going to Niger. Far from a serious fact-finding mission, it was a "Take Your Daughters to Work Day" gone bad. Maybe liberals shouldn't have been so insistent about that special prosecutor.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; cialeak; coulter; foxylady; josephwilson; plame; plamenameblamegame; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2005 4:45:41 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
RULES!


2 posted on 07/13/2005 4:48:27 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

nice pic :D hehe


3 posted on 07/13/2005 4:49:51 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Despite the colloquialism being used on TV to describe the relevant criminal offense, the law does not criminalize "revealing the name" of a covert operative. If it did, every introduction of an operative at a cocktail party or a neighborhood picnic would constitute a felony. "Revealing the name of" is shorthand to describe what the law does criminalize: Intentionally revealing a covert operative as a covert operative, knowing it will blow the operative's cover.

A VERY important point.

The crime, if any, was committed by the reporters who reported who Plame was.

4 posted on 07/13/2005 4:50:40 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 ("Familiarity doesn't breed contempt, it IS contempt."--Florence King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1; cyncooper

Come looky...this is good!


5 posted on 07/13/2005 4:51:18 PM PDT by mystery-ak (The real Supreme Court meets up here...God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Picture please. You know the rules. Something in a swimsuit perhaps.


6 posted on 07/13/2005 4:51:54 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
#1 question: WHO at the CIA okayed a Democrat FORMER Ambassador and a Bush hater that has NO uranium expertise to go to Niger and sip sweet tea and meet with "people" for a week? He didn't even WRITE A REPORT!!!

WHO SIGNED OFF ON THIS SCAM????!!!!

7 posted on 07/13/2005 4:51:55 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Did Rush write this ?


8 posted on 07/13/2005 4:52:34 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Oh yeah!!!!! Tell 'em Ann.


9 posted on 07/13/2005 4:52:42 PM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Wednesday nights with Ann Coulter!

Ann will be on Hannity&Colmes this evening.

10 posted on 07/13/2005 4:53:10 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I owe you a ping or two, and this is well worth reading.


11 posted on 07/13/2005 4:53:15 PM PDT by SmithL (There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
AC nails it again.

L

12 posted on 07/13/2005 4:53:36 PM PDT by Lurker (" Many are already stating that the decision in Kelo renders the contract null and void.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

Here's something I wonder: when he wrote this "column," did he have it vetted by the CIA or was he devulging classified information?


13 posted on 07/13/2005 4:55:55 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Excellent!

Plunk your magic twanger, froggy Clown Wilson!

14 posted on 07/13/2005 4:56:05 PM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

A very enjoyable read. She almost had me convinced that maybe Plame sent her husband on a propaganda junket on her own authority.

But if the CIA paid his expenses, somebody at a higher level must have approved this ridiculous and possibly criminal appointment. Who?

Who was the CIA official who was complicit in this deliberate attempt to undermine the Bush war effort by an amateur who had no business doing the job he was given to do? Tenet has denied responsibility. But surely some Friend of Bill's who was in on the plot, possibly Tenet himself. Certainly Tenet worked hard to undermine the Iraqi war before he was fired.


15 posted on 07/13/2005 4:56:54 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Im betting his little spy wifey helped him write it....


16 posted on 07/13/2005 4:58:00 PM PDT by mystery-ak (The real Supreme Court meets up here...God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Big BTTT!


17 posted on 07/13/2005 4:58:22 PM PDT by sarasmom (Attrition levels are acceptable and lower than expected. War is an ugly thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

The most astonishing thing about this to me is that when Wilson wrote his Op-Ed, he HADN'T EVEN TURNED IN A REPORT TO THE CIA!!!


18 posted on 07/13/2005 4:59:40 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

..Driven by that weird obsession liberals have of pretending they are Republicans in order to attack Republicans...
------
Yes, the statement captures the long-standing truth that the libs ALWAYS ACCUSE THE REPUBS OF DOING EXACTLY WHAT THEY DO...good article...it sure AGAIN exposes another lying, loser liberal Dem (or just Dem fo short, same thing) for what they really are...liars, cheats, criminals working real hard to make people believe they are not...


19 posted on 07/13/2005 5:02:36 PM PDT by EagleUSA (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Here's something I wonder: when he wrote this "column," did he have it vetted by the CIA or was he devulging classified information?

Very good question

20 posted on 07/13/2005 5:05:12 PM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson