You're wrong, of course.
The Wilsons were up to something with this Niger trip and if the sixteen words (which the British still stand by) had not been in the speech they would have found another hook to hang their hat on.
BTW, Wilson was in the media in the months following the SOTU speech and said not one word about any concerns he later claimed to have about the uranium aspect. The fact is, he lied about the context and scope of his trip completely. The President and his aides did not.
Lets think about this aspect for a minute....a couple of things come to mind. Who put the words in the speech? I don't recall all the reporting on this, but there was some contention about who did or did not approve those words. Also, there is the issue of the forgeries, that Wilson said he saw....long before they were in the hands of the CIA; then he said he "misspoke" about those. Top all that off with the Rockerfeller memo.....remember that one? The game plan to use intelligence information to undermine the president. When was the Rocky memo revealed? Who put those 16 words in the SOTU? Was this all a set up by a rogue group sponsored by/working for the DNC? I sure hope the results of this criminal investigation cover all these things. (And yes, I have my tin foil hat on) :-)