Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Byron York: There's a lot we don't know yet about the CIA flap
The Hill ^ | 7/13/05 | Byron York

Posted on 07/13/2005 3:28:51 PM PDT by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last
To: Howlin
even went "drama queen" on us, by saying he had already told his seven year old son good-bye because he knew he was going to prison before the phone call came as he was walking out the door.

Yes Howlin, he is just a prince, isn't he?

I was listening to Byron York in amazement today when he was on the Hannity program. He also said that Cooper's lawyers had the iron clad release document in hand when they called Rove's lawyers last week. They asked him if the terms in the document (which the Special Prosecutor wrote!) that said "Mr. Rove authorizes any person to release his name as the source" meant Cooper. His lawyer, incredulously, said, "Yes--if he is a person, then any person means him."

The "drama queens" were not finished. After a flurry of phone calls and more reassurances, lawyers for Cooper only then gathered all their buddies from the media and held a soap opera press conference they hoped the public would swallow. This contained the teary eyed Cooper acting like he just received a gallows pardon from the Governor.

The only problem with this charade is that Rove signed the release in 2003!!!!! These two reporters and their lawyers have been caught red handed, lying to the American people.

41 posted on 07/13/2005 4:31:31 PM PDT by SkyPilot (Eliminate, eradicate, and stamp out redundancy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Sweet fine!

For a second there, I thought you were talking about me again.

42 posted on 07/13/2005 4:32:40 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I am trying to find any article that discusses what Cooper said on the steps that day.

I want to read it word for word.


43 posted on 07/13/2005 4:33:17 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Rove signed the waiver about a year and a half ago and has never changed it. Why was that waiver not acceptable to Cooper for 18 months and then, on the brink of going to jail, Cooper agreed to testify? I don’t know.

We're counting on you, Mr. York, to get to the bottom of this set up.

44 posted on 07/13/2005 4:34:15 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Cooper took the podium in the court and told the judge, "Last night I hugged my son good-bye and told him it might be a long time before I see him again."

"I went to bed ready to accept the sanctions" for not testifying, Cooper said. But he told the judge that not long before his early afternoon appearance, he had received "in somewhat dramatic fashion" a direct personal communication from his source freeing him from his commitment to keep the source's identity secret.


45 posted on 07/13/2005 4:35:26 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Howlin

David Shuster just said that according to Cooper .. he was one of the final witnesses for the Grand Jury


46 posted on 07/13/2005 4:37:50 PM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Re: your tag line. ---- If Judith Miller remains silent through her incarceration, do we ever find out who she's covering for?


47 posted on 07/13/2005 4:38:24 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Gergen: It appears that Rove does NOT have a legal problem.


48 posted on 07/13/2005 4:38:39 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

He said a source in the CIA leak investigation had phoned him this morning to release him from his pledge of confidentiality and encouraged him to testify. That source is believed to be White House political strategist Karl Rove, who has acknowledged speaking with Cooper but has denied unmasking the CIA agent's identity.

and

Another reporter who had been facing jail time on the same matter, Matthew Cooper of Time magazine, agreed today to testify to a grand jury about his confidential source on the same matter, thus avoiding jail. Mr. Cooper said he had decided to do so only because his source specifically released him from promises of confidentiality just before today's hearing.

--

Mr. Cooper told the judge that he had been prepared to go to jail until shortly before the hearing.

"Last night I hugged my son good-bye and told him it might be a long time before I see him again," Mr. Cooper said. But just before today's hearing, he had received "in somewhat dramatic fashion" a direct personal communication from his source freeing him from his commitment to keep the source's identity secret.

"It's with a bit of surprise and no small amount of relief that I will comply with the subpoena," he told the judge.

and

Separately, the White House correspondent for Time magazine, Matthew Cooper, said he would testify, breaking two years of silence, after his source consented in a "very sudden development" Wednesday morning....


49 posted on 07/13/2005 4:38:41 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

No.


50 posted on 07/13/2005 4:39:00 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Damn.


51 posted on 07/13/2005 4:39:25 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
The only problem with this charade is that Rove signed the release in 2003!!!!! These two reporters and their lawyers have been caught red handed, lying to the American people.

EXACTLY!

52 posted on 07/13/2005 4:39:46 PM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

They just never tell ALL the facts, do they?

Matthews never ever says that she wasn't undercover and that the Senate Intelligence Committee said Wilson was an out and out liar.


53 posted on 07/13/2005 4:40:06 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

And I think that's why she's in jail.

Her source is not Rove.

And she's not going to name that Democrat.


54 posted on 07/13/2005 4:40:51 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Gergen: It appears that Rove does NOT have a legal problem.

No Kidding

We've been saying that for some time now

55 posted on 07/13/2005 4:40:59 PM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; All
I believe it was on July 6th, here is one link about it.

Remember everyone, the "other shoe to drop" is that Robert Novak as said this: Novak: 'I will reveal all'

You can bet your next paycheck that when the grand jury ends its investigation, Novak is going to spill quite a bit. Cooper and Miller better hold those book deals and acceptance speeches for next award presentation by their peers. Novak has the facts that can embarrass them if they try to stretch the truth any further, and they certainly will try.

56 posted on 07/13/2005 4:41:22 PM PDT by SkyPilot (Eliminate, eradicate, and stamp out redundancy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

The Rats never come clean! They rather slit their throats than to turn on another RATS, not like the RINOS who so happily and willingly back-stab a pub! Cooper will never divulge his connection. Right now Rove is flapping in the wind and the RATS love it! I wonder if the truth will ever be known...just curious!


57 posted on 07/13/2005 4:41:41 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I've seen one or two articles that said the agency was afraid that Aldrich Ames had outed her to the Russians. That would have been 1994.

Also Cuba (Cuber for you Sub Commander Kennedy afficianados out there) received an inadvertant copy of a report naming Plame as a covert agent.

At any rate, she was brought back to Washington in 1994 and given a desk job. When Novak published his article (2003), she would have been out of the covert business for at least nine years.


58 posted on 07/13/2005 4:42:17 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Double damn.


59 posted on 07/13/2005 4:42:17 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

When I talk about you, I call you honey!


60 posted on 07/13/2005 4:42:27 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson