Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
"Miller's got guts, admire her for that."

Maybe, but possibly the identity of her source would be a profound embarrassment both to her and her employer, the NYT, an embarrassment compared to which jail time would be preferable.
23 posted on 07/13/2005 12:33:08 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
Regarding Miller, is it true her source also waived confidentiality? If so, if Miller won't divulge their name, why won't the 'source' come forward?

Sorry if this has been discussed into the ground before; been woefully busy and unable to keep up lately. Any opinions welcome to help me get up to date!

27 posted on 07/13/2005 12:40:03 PM PDT by uvular
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Steve_Seattle

Or maybe her only source is not Karl Rove, and she is protecting someone else who hasn't given her a waiver.


73 posted on 07/13/2005 3:23:41 PM PDT by Dr. Free Market (Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson