The Brits assumed that by allowing Muslims a free-run to carry on their activities in distant parts of the globe from their soil, they can gain their favours. They could play nice with the Muslims (Pakis) and also "advice" us on how we should be handling our internal problems.
And for quite sometime the Brits used these Khalistani, Kashmiri and Pakistani groups as proxies to meddle in our regional disputes...... couldnt get over the fact that we are no more their colonies.
....And now their pharisaical stuff has turned on them.
Just look at how their media refers to the bombers as "Asians" as opposed to Pakistanis.
Asians?? Yeah riiiight! Ever heard of a Hindu or a Sikh "bomber" bombing London?
I always wonder why the Brits call Pakis "Asians" - to American ears, it makes them sound like Chinese.
>>"Asians" as opposed to Pakistanis.
Asians?? Yeah riiiight! Ever heard of a Hindu or a Sikh "bomber" bombing London?
Asians the New Euphemism - A Quick Guide
(Cronos has seen this rant before)
In America, what used to called Orientals
In the UK, Those from the Indian Subcontinent
In REALITY --
Russians from Vladivostok, Inuits from Siberia, all Orientals, IndoChin, Indians, Persians, and even Irakis and Kurds are Asians.
<< Asians?? Yeah riiiight! Ever heard of a Hindu or a Sikh "bomber" bombing London? >>
Canada? [Sikhs]
Manila. [Sikhs]
Air India. [Sikhs]
Irish Sea. [Sikhs]
New Delhi. [Sikhs]
Abjectly corrupt, horrid, thieving, looting, lying, little totalitarian monster former Indian Prime Ministers. [Sikhs]
Australian missionaries and their children? [Hindus]
Any and all Christians who offer Indian children education -- and/or salvation? [Hindus]
And open season on muslims and mosques at all times and through all ages. [Hindus]
Etceteras adfinitum .......