Posted on 07/12/2005 11:22:22 PM PDT by warsaw44
The Soviet Union maintained them before. Countries like Pakistan and Iran struggle to build bombs roughly equivalent to the Fat Man dropped on Nagasaki. Small nuclear weapons are very challenging to design, because they test the limits of how little nuclear materials are necessary to create critical mass. To maintain such weapons requires a huge industrial base.
As are Arabs.
If the bones of Yassir Arafat or Saddam Hussein were found along some road, the forensic pathologist would describe them as the remains of a "Caucasian male."
It's not like they're black or asian.
Most folks overlook that, especially on a first post. If you really want it changed, ping a Moderator and ask them to correct your error. They can make changes in titles and dates, but not the actual content of a post.
A note of caution...you may be asked to provide a peace offering...you know, something like Chok-Lit, gold bullion, or your first-born. Not often, but occasionally.
Thanks Griffin,
I'd never read that before. Rather chilling to say the least.
No one other than Ahnold and friends would be able to carry these as an actual suitcase. Go to Home Depot and pick up an 80 pound bag of concret. Now imagine putting a handle on it and carrying it around for more than a few seconds. Now realize that these bombs are suppose to weigh 110 to 180 pounds. That latter is 2 and a quarter 80 pound bags. No way. The name is misleading. Kind of like putting a handle on the top of a wide screen TV and calling it portable.
LOL
Well I can't say snopes proved this to be a hoax. A bunch of circumstantial hypothesizing is all they presented to attempt to discredit Washington's Vision.
Regarding your point on the term 'Union'; I don't think the vocabulary of supernatural entities is bound by the contemporary language of men. I guess I would expect that if an angel used specific terms then that might be important to note and remember regardless if it was in use at the time.
"Well I can't say snopes proved this to be a hoax. A bunch of circumstantial hypothesizing is all they presented to attempt to discredit Washington's Vision. "
What they said is that theres no evidence to prove it TRUE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.