Posted on 07/12/2005 8:33:59 PM PDT by ex-Texan
1. this has already been posted 2x here tonight.
2. Why in the world are you paying any attention to coast to coast
And this story has been around for years. If they had 'em, they would have used 'em by now.
Heard the show. George is sometimes so gullible, or acts that way. The only show they ever did that got me going was the first one on Peak Oil.
Coast to Coast talks about faces carved into mountains on Mars, alien visitation, and had a guy on in 2001 who predicted Bush would no longer be President in the year 2002. How can you question such an unimpeachable source???? ;)
Yeah, when you see an Arab with a nuclear warhead strapped to his chest
walking down the street, remember to call Barney Fife at the Mayberry
Police Department. The Soviets had backpack/suitcase nukes prepositioned
in the USA since the mid-1970s - the only way you can defend against the
threat of a suitcase nuke is to avoid being where it is likely to go off.
Stay out of Manhattan and DC and you've very little risk. Eventually one
will be detonated in NYC or DC and you'll find out that, while killing
thousands of people, the damage will be far less than you expect. In fact
the collapse of the WTC towers released well more than 12 kilotons of
energy, so you'll likely see less of a blast radius than that of the WTC
tower collapse. There will be radioactive fallout, and Manhattan (and
probably Queens and Brooklyn) will need to be evacuated for a few weeks or
even a month. Sure it's bad, but it is nothing like the threat of
widespread nuclear war that we faced from the Soviets in the 1970s and
1980s. Avoid NYC and DC and you'll be safe.
if you took the time to read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" -
published by the AEC back in the 1950s, you'd know that the reason
Hiroshima and Nagasaki had so much damage is because those cities were
composed mostly of WOOD BUILDINGS. Most of the concrete structures even
those close to ground zero survived. In addition, Hiroshima and Nagasaki
were chosen for their locations in the bowl between hills to focus the
blast effect of an airburst (which you can't even do with a suitcase nuke
unless you can throw it up in the air to 1,500 feet above ground level.
A
suitcase nuke in NYC will cause LESS damage than the WTC collapse. NYC is
not made of single story wood (burnable) buildings - it is made of
strongly built concrete and steel - and a ground burst will have the blast
focused UPWARD (not downward like an airburst at Nagasaki or Hiroshima),
and the surrounding concrete/steel buildings will act as tampers and
focus even more of that blast upward.
Suitcase nukes. That is one of worst scams perpetrated on the American public since the global warming hoax and one-hour Martinizing.
Chem trails was Goerge Noory's best of show
And why would anyone listen to what this guy has to say?
What is "coast to coast" and why shouldn't he pay attention to them?
""The Soviets had backpack/suitcase nukes prepositioned
in the USA since the mid-1970s""
this nonsense again????
"Coast to Coast" is the radio show for the Black Helicopter/Tinfoil Hat crowd.
Art Bell,Coast to Coast,=Fraud,Hoax,Losers
Yeah, what ever happened to all these backpack nukes that were missing ... I agree with you, I never found this rumor to have much validity.
Ah, no wonder I don't know it.
one-hour Martinizing.
What about 3 hour hannitizing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.