Next!
I've only had a few problems discussing this with people who are not political junkies:
1) Explaining who Karl Rove is.
2) Explaining who Joe Wilson is.
3) Explaining who Valerie Plaime is.
4) Explaining who Robert Novak is.
5) Explaining who Judith Miller is.
6) Explaining why, even assuming any of the allegations are true, anyone without a political agenda should give a rat's rump about it.
Other than that, this story has great legs. Especially if one compares it to the much less interesting Jeff Gannon "scandal".
everyone says this thing is going nowhere, but it seems to command a lot of posts and replies
Nice job Ken Mehlman! This response was handled with the usual class I've come to expect from this party.
God forbid the mainstream media be confused by the facts.
It was amazing to watch David Gregory go after Scott McClelland tooth and fang. He looked like a rabid dog. I understand why the dems are trying to make chicken salad out of chicken shit, but the MSM should be capable of seeing the way the wind is blowing, yet they try to hold the party line. They will be made to look very, very foolish and will result in further marginalizing the MSM. Have they not heard of internet bloggers? They are the compass as the story gets directed off course. There is discussion and there are instantly thousands, tens of thousands of editors, some extremely well informed. Yet they keep up their trash talk.