[beekay]

Book'em Dano

Makes you wonder who it is Miller is protecting - for sure, it is not Rove

[durasell]

She's protecting her career. If she talks, nobody will ever trust her again.

[vollmond]

I have a suspicion that the NY Times and Judith Miller are keeping silent because to reveal all they know would prove that there was no crime committed by Rove. Since they know that the information they have reveals no wrong-doing on anyone's part, they feel justified in ignoring the Grand Jury's call for testimony. An added bonus (or the primary bonus) is that they can continue to bash Rove and the administration with lies as long as they don't testify under oath that they know the opposite is true.

In summary, they're not protecting anyone, but they want to keep the cloud hanging over the Bush administration and keep hammering them on rumor, innuendo and speculation. All of that would go away if their part of the story is testified to under oath.