Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leaving a Supreme Legacy
The Washington Times ^ | July 11, 2005 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 07/12/2005 8:44:37 AM PDT by Oliver Optic

In 2000, some conservatives went to the polls without much enthusiasm for George W. Bush. What drove many of them was the simple fact that a president nominates Supreme Court justices, and they counted on him to follow through on his promise to select judges in the mold of Associate Justices Clarence Thomas or Antonin Scalia.

Now, Mr. Bush has a chance to repay conservatives for the elections in 2000, 2002 and 2004, and to set the stage for 2006.

There are varying opinions about how much the issue of judges moves voters. Some Republican senators think it is worth a few percentage points for the party.

But Sen. George Allen of Virginia, who was chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign in the last election cycle, said it was the issue that got the most applause during his cross-country travels. And strategists point out that judges may not swing many voters, but the issue does get conservatives to open their checkbooks and get off their couches to campaign and vote....

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Good article from the Washington Times Insider blog.

I'm confident that the President and his advisors understand this ... at least I think I'm confident, sort of.

1 posted on 07/12/2005 8:44:38 AM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson