Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Ok, another article that I just read indicated that it was Cooper protecting his own partisanship that led him to refuse to testify about his source and the nature of the conversation. Is it possible that since the Times was leading the call for the appointment of the independent council, that they are protecting their own butt in that they also knew that the Whitehouse was not leaking Plame's identity to get back at Wilson? In other words is Miller in jail as a CYA for the NYT?


255 posted on 07/12/2005 5:28:27 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

That's it in a nutshell.


256 posted on 07/12/2005 5:33:30 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud (McCain, you'll never be president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

To: Eva

Eva, you're must smarter about the in's and out's of this political intrigue than I am.........don't ask me! But that certainly sounds feasible and reasonable to assume.

BTW, Brit Hume pointed out tonight that Scooter Libby also signed a blanket waiver for all the reporters HE talked to at the same time Rove did.

When Libby signed his, Cooper testified before the GR, presumably telling "all." Now, why on earth would he NOT testify after Rove signed his if he had for Scooter?

We are missing something here......big time.


257 posted on 07/12/2005 5:35:13 PM PDT by Howlin (Who is Judith Miller covering up for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson