Posted on 07/11/2005 7:19:00 PM PDT by bayourod
----SNIP----
Q: How is the undocumented immigrant community affecting the U.S. economy? A: First and foremost, it's a source of value added. The total goods and services that they consume through their paycheck, plus all that they produce for their employers, is close to about $800 billion.
They're also producing at relatively lower costs because the undocumented population typically gets about 20% less in wages than if they were legalized. That leads to lower prices for us and higher profits to employers.
In addition, they're obviously a huge consumer base. We've seen that 90% of the wages that the undocumented population gets are spent inside the U.S. Remittances are sent abroad, but that only represents about 10% of immigrants' income. The numbers are becoming quite huge. We estimate about $50 billion dollars in remittances this year. That means that total consumptive capacity remaining in the U.S. is $400 billion to $450 billion.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...
We saw that from the Buchanan supporters during the 2000 election period, but isn't it a little too soon for the Tancredo people to start it?
See my profile page if you are curious about me.
Stick with the propaganda - humor ain't your forte.
You are so full of it, as is business week. If the low level immigrants were so great, we should import all of Mexico. But then we would BE Mexico, a cesspool. I don't know why you don't give it up bayourod
Is that supposed to be an intelligent comment? Apparently all of the arguments of the Antis have been so throughly refuted that they have nothing left to post except insults and absurdities.
"Is that supposed to be an intelligent comment?"
No, it isn't supposed to be a particularly intelligent comment, it is however an obvious one and one that is above your head. Your points have been refuted endlessly on each and every thread you post on. So now we have come to the point where THE RULE must be invoked: Never argue with crazy people.
"Apparently all of the arguments of the Antis have been so throughly refuted that they have nothing left to post except insults and absurdities."
I deal with illegals most days of the week, if you believe they are not a problem, simply post your address and I will send a bunch your way to squat on your property. And no, that's not a ridiculous comment (to preempt your rebuttal). You are the one who believes we should greet the illegals with open arms because they are such a boon to humanity (and without concern for being inundated by their numbers or quality). Theefore, you should have no problem with illegals overwhelming your goodwill - since that is what you propose for the rest of us that have to live with the consequences of illegals.
"I don't hire illegals, don't know any illegals that I know of, "
Quoted from your profile. That sure shows you how clueless you are, if you don't even know an illegal. Let me introduce you to a thousand of them some time. I speak Spanish fluently, I hope you do to and can understand when some pandillero calls you a pinche cabron down in the barrio.
.
Why would I be clueless about something if I don't know any illegal immigrants?
Although there are an estimated 400,000 illegals in my county, I don't work construction sites. But that doesn't mean that I don't know that they are essential to the construction industry here.
The landscaping company I use is owned by a man with an Irish name and Texas accent. I don't know his employees, or whether they are illegals, but I know the job they do.
I don't know any of the waiters who wait on me at restaurants.
I don't know the men who pick up my garbage.
I don't know the men who repair the streets in my area.
I don't know the men who work at the car wash.
I don't know the clerks at the stores where I shop.
I don't hang out in Mexican Cantinas or attend an Hispanic chrch.
I do have a lot of contact with businessmen who are apparently first generation immigrants. One, an engineer, was awarded a commendation by President Bush for his work with the Commission on Terrorism. Most are Indians and Pakistani. Some are Viet Namese. A few are Hispanic. A few are Africans. One is British. One is Australian. But I would be very surprised if any of them were illegal aliens.
Do you know a lot of illegal aliens? How do you know them? Do you ask people to see their papers? How do you know they are illegal?
He's interested in profiling."<
_Funny. I don't know who they are, and I doubt Cartman90210 wants to do what you say he wants; but I can tell you this: Thse Hispanic protesters aren't interested in the sovereignty of the United States, or the protection of our country.
They carried signs that bashed Bush, and they called this country "Aztlan".
You want to defend that? Fact is, they don't and won't vote Republican, and by your own tagline "Unless we get 40% of the Hispanic vote..." reveals that you know the other 60% are voting for liberal Democrats. In one of those pictures, these Pro-illegal Hispanic immigration marchers were walking with Tom Hayden, who is a communist.
One of their signs say: "No border is legitimate."
Is that something you agree with?
"They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty.
These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its direction, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass."~ Thomas Jefferson (on excessive and unlimited immigration from a single country)
So what.
And these criminals need to be sent home!
........Immediately! .......And the borders need to be closed!
My proposal: $10 bounty on each Illegal Criminal Alien turned in. If there are 10 million of them then we can solve the problem for $100 million. Cheap by any means!
Then we begin construction of the Moat!
Only if the demand for their labor is here. Once demand is met with guest workers there won't be any incentive for more to come. (And no, they aren't eliginble for welfare)
No one has ever explained how President Bush's proposal would encourage more immigrants to come.
The only thing I can see that would encourage more illegals is the constant screaming of the Buchanan/Tancredo crowd that amnesty is on the way.
Your immigration myths and personal account of seeing a dozen men of Hispanic origin in traffic court isn't probative of anything.
Your time certainly isn't worth much. I wouldn't do anything for $10 an hour and it would take more than an hour to capture, turn in, fill out the paper work and collect the reward. The parking fees for the lots near the federal building are more than $10.00.
Another unworkable solution by an anti-illegal.
BS. As is typical, you left out the REAL root cause for illegal immigration, or at least, the other half of the economic equation.
As long as there is someone available who'll work for less, come they will.
Don't bother responding, my comment is for those susceptable to reason.
"Are you saying a public utility hired an illegal & you witnessed it first-hand?
Hmmmm"
-Nope. I din't say they were "illegal" I said they were "immigrants from Mexico." The guys on the crew would joke about the one guy from Mexico who was incredibly lazy. I recall the crew leader saying: "Yup, Juan pretty much defies the hard working Hispanic stereotype!"
You're doing far better there than we're doing here in California, especially SoCal which is well on the way to Balkanization thanks to our feckless federal government and the gaggle of third world activists that are burrowed in around here.
Another counter-argument by a Pro-criminal here at FR.
"...former Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castaneda told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearingthat "No border security is possible without Mexican cooperation" and that "there can be no cooperation [from the Mexican government] without some sort of immigration reform package." Castaneda (former Mexican foreign Minister)..."went on to describe immigration reform as amnesty for all Mexicans living illegally in the U.S., the admission of some 5 million additional Mexican citizens to the U.S. over the next ten years, and massive increases in U.S. aid to that country."
You want to comment on that? Or the statements below? or do you want to continue to IGNORE them?
You want to call the above people "Buchananites"?
"My proposal: $10 bounty on each Illegal Criminal Alien turned in."
[Your time certainly isn't worth much. I wouldn't do anything for $10 an hour ]
Except I could turn in a hundred in an hour, so $1000 an hour isn't bad.
Typical anti-business, anti-free market, liberal socialist attitude.
Even your evil greedy employers have to compete for good employees and they have to pay the market rate. Good legal employees can command the market rate (or more).
Once we have ensured that our legal labor market is large enough to sustain our economic growth we can afford to start enforcing laws against companies that hire illegals.
American companies don't like having to rely upon illegal employees and Mexican immigrants don't like having to live here and work here illegally.
The idea that neither employers nor employees will take advantage of a guest worker program is just another immigration myth promulgated by the Buchanan/Tancredo type Antis.
By the way. The Antis claim that they have no problem with legal immigrants, it's only the illegal ones that they oppose. But yet the Antis oppose any type immigration reform that would substitute legal workers for illegal ones. It's hard not to suspect that their real agenda is motivated by their anti-Bush, anti-business, anti-trade, anti-Republican, anti-growth mentality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.