Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.K. memo suggests mid-2006 for troop reduction
startribune ^ | July 11, 2005 | Glenn Frankel

Posted on 07/11/2005 9:34:01 AM PDT by phoenix_004

The United States and Britain are drawing up plans to withdraw the majority of their troops from Iraq by the middle of next year, according to a secret memo written for British Prime Minister Tony Blair by Defense Secretary John Reid.

The paper, which is marked "Secret -- UK Eyes Only," said "emerging U.S. plans assume that 14 out of 18 provinces could be handed over to Iraqi control by early 2006," allowing a reduction in overall U.S.-led forces in Iraq to 66,000 troops. The troop level is now about 160,000, including 138,000 U.S. troops, according to a military spokesperson in Baghdad.

Reid on Sunday did not dispute the authenticity of the document but said no decision on troop levels had been made. In Washington, a Pentagon spokesman said officials there had not seen the document.

The undated memo, which was reported in the newspaper The Mail on Sunday, stated that "current U.S. political military thinking is still evolving. But there is a strong U.S. military desire for significant force reductions to bring relief to overall U.S. commitment levels."

While top U.S. military commanders and Pentagon officials have been hoping to reduce troop levels in Iraq for some time, the British memo is apparently the first time such a significant reduction has been outlined under a specific timetable. President Bush has refused to set a withdrawal date, citing concerns that such a deadline would allow insurgents to wait out the U.S.-led occupation.

The memo, available on the newspaper's website via www.startribune.com/324, notes a debate between U.S. officials at the Pentagon and military leaders in Iraq, saying officials in Washington favor "a relatively bold reduction in force numbers," differing with battlefield commanders, "whose approach is more cautious."

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: troopreduction

1 posted on 07/11/2005 9:34:03 AM PDT by phoenix_004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

Actually, I liked the puppy more than the story.


2 posted on 07/11/2005 9:40:17 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004

now it switched to a (viking) kitty!


3 posted on 07/11/2005 9:40:35 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix_004
Image hosted by Photobucket.com memmo-schmemmo, the Brits said they were pulling out almost ALL their troops from Iraq, sending them to Afghanistan, and handing over control of all their duties in Iraq to Australia...
4 posted on 07/11/2005 10:42:22 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson