Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

I agree. Even so, it was not helpful when, Rove's attorney first said Rove wasn't the one who called Cooper to personally release him to testify about their conversations, then last week admit that it was Rove who called Cooper with the OK to testify. But there's still no reason for Rove to resign.


110 posted on 07/11/2005 5:26:26 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace

Rove called Cooper and said that it was OK for him to testify about their conversations. There is nothing illegal in that.

If it is true that "Rove called" and not a lawyer or some aide called on behalf of Rove, then it is not true that Rove did not call Cooper. It is also possible that "OK to testify" is not a fair summary of what Rove released Cooper to do.


111 posted on 07/11/2005 5:32:46 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson