Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
But if you think about it, you realize that there are reasons why there are gaps in the facts. It's because the government knows stuff, but isn't talking about it.

OK, I've thought about it (before you even suggested it, believe it or not).

What I realize is that the only people being held in contempt for refusing to talk are reporters. I don't seen any government people not talking.

If you're referring to grand jury secrecy by "not talking", that is false. Secrecy does not equal "not talking". The SP presented reams of documentation to the courts to buttress the grand jury subpoenas and the courts stated they were not abusive but necessary.

94 posted on 07/11/2005 3:15:22 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper

To me, it looks like you agree with me on more than you disagree. I never said that the SP was abusive, or tried to defend the reporters' actions.

The only thing we disagree on, as far as I can see, is the question of whether Plame was truly "covert." You say no, I say yes. And the only reason I say yes is that we would not have gotten this far if she hadn't been.


98 posted on 07/11/2005 3:24:52 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson