That's not the story, though. That story was printed 2 years ago. The story they are printing now is that Rove is the source for this nonexistent crime.
Um, the story started with Rove doing the (non) crime.
That is not new news.
And the factual points I've made have never been "the story" in the media as they ought to have been.
To this day as the Times,WaPo, TIME, Newsweek, etc, report it, they say with indignation that the WH was trying to undermine Wilson without pointing out Wilson's credibility by all that is sane and rational was in tatters long long ago.
The tack they take is the WH had no right to dispute the lies Wilson was spreading (with the help of his rogue cohorts).
I have the correct perspective.
I'll go ahead and add that your post earlier about "our side" muddying the waters by presenting facts was so much nonsense.