No, your statements are illogical and incomprehensible, because they are driven by emotion and ignorance.
You advocated rewarding foreigners who have willfully broken American laws for their own benefit. Rewarding them with a laundry list of benefits not extended to any citizen.
Principally, and most incomprehensibly, you advocated rewarding them with something sought by billions of people across the planet: citizenship in the United States. The "logic" you employed to justify such a thing was a juvenile justification: if they want it, why can't they have it?
And your ignorance of the situation was shown by your lack of understanding of even the simplest legal consequences. But, of course, being childish and emotional, you dismiss such consequences by prattling about "I'm not talking legal here".
Run it by everyone here again. See how much agreement you get. What you said is that people who have broken multiple federal laws, and state laws, of the United States, people who are not of the citizenry, under law, should be rewarded with the same status as those whose laws they flagrantly violated. Period. There is no arguing that that is what you said.
There is no defense. You advocate not just an amnesty for the crime(s), but nothing less than a reward for those crimes, a reward that countless millions across the planet would die to get. That millions wait patiently for, endless years of waiting to take the oath. And that others have died to preserve.
No two ways about it. That's what you advocate.
You are not hearing what I am saying, and you haven't from the beginning. I don't see any point in going through it again. You feel how you feel. Fine. Feel that way.