To: coconutt2000
Very nice analysis of Gonzales. But what did you mean by saying the problem is his integrity -- that he's too conservative to legislate from the bench? Isn't that what we want?
To: ContraryMary
...that he's too conservative to legislate from the bench? Isn't that what we want?
No, we don't want any judge to legislate from the bench (or anywhere else for that matter). What we want is for Supreme Court justices to strictly interpret the Constitution with the intent of the Framers firmly in mind, and to interpret statutes within that Constitutional framework.
This is the very antithesis of "legislating from the bench."
To: ContraryMary
Very nice analysis of Gonzales. But what did you mean by saying the problem is his integrity -- that he's too conservative to legislate from the bench? Isn't that what we want? It was sarcasm. That is exactly what we want, but some people seem too blinded by their political agendas to realize that.
206 posted on
07/10/2005 10:30:04 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson