Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coconutt2000

Very nice analysis of Gonzales. But what did you mean by saying the problem is his integrity -- that he's too conservative to legislate from the bench? Isn't that what we want?


122 posted on 07/10/2005 9:04:14 AM PDT by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: ContraryMary
...that he's too conservative to legislate from the bench? Isn't that what we want?

No, we don't want any judge to legislate from the bench (or anywhere else for that matter). What we want is for Supreme Court justices to strictly interpret the Constitution with the intent of the Framers firmly in mind, and to interpret statutes within that Constitutional framework.

This is the very antithesis of "legislating from the bench."
135 posted on 07/10/2005 9:14:22 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: ContraryMary
Very nice analysis of Gonzales. But what did you mean by saying the problem is his integrity -- that he's too conservative to legislate from the bench? Isn't that what we want?

It was sarcasm. That is exactly what we want, but some people seem too blinded by their political agendas to realize that.

206 posted on 07/10/2005 10:30:04 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson