Per the DU poster comment: "Anyway, in the end, if Rove lied to the Grand Jury about telling Cooper that Wilson's wife was CIA, that's perjury."
That comment does not really make sense. If the gist of Rove's coversation with Cooper was to refute that Cheney or Tenet sent Wilson, how could Rove say it was Wilson's wife WITHOUT anyone knowing she worked for the CIA (implicitly or explicitly)? I don't think any regular working Joe or Jane has the authority to initiate CIA investigations.
Do the libs really believe that Rove would knowingly release the identity of an agent so that agent would be in harm's way?? (not that it appears that she was covert anyway).
It is so funny seeing a DU'er talking about perjury after all where they upset about X42's meaning of the word is.