"GW needs to read this on national tv."
a great idea!
Bush, however, seems to think it is OK to "move on" from the Saddam stuff. But he is wrong, because the left has not moved on. This whole thread is filled with an unbelievable amount of great information. One could write a book just utilizing the stuff on this thread---and someone should!
As for me, I believe Iraq was a clogged toilet that need to be flushed. Saddam was in violation of the cease fire agreement and thats that. Klintoon should have sent in the troops when the inspectors were tossed out,....whether or not they found anything was irrelevant.He was shooting at our pilots every day. 43 just finished the job 41 should have. BTW, it was the UN and Colin Powell that talked 41 into stopping the war because we didn't have a "mandate" from the UN to go to Baghdad. I believe Schwartzkopf wanted to go on in since he was already there. AKA Patton wanting to go on into Russia, aka MacArthur wanting to bomb the Yellow river with a nuke. We never learn to finish the job because we will have to later.Why didn't we just finish the North Koreans and the North Vietnamese, I'll never know. Just think if we had finished the Ruskies after the war, before they had nukes. I wouldn't have grown up diving under my desk at school and we would have a few trillion more in tax revenue. Why is Castro still breathing? Who is going to get upset if we invade Cuba?
Excuse me, I'm beginning to rant.
We need to stay the course in Iraq, or we will pay dearly later.( not that we aren't paying dearly now)