Shaddup, loser!
Posted on 07/09/2005 4:48:28 PM PDT by kralcmot
I'd rather fight than barf.
Well I've got to agree with Reid here, we need a strict constructionist who is going to abide by the Constitution rather than adjudicate new laws based on their political ideology.
Article says, "someone who will bring us together; a mainstream justice who won't use their judicial robe as a cloak to impose their political ideology on the country."
Yeah, that statement always makes me think of Ruth Ginsburg or David Souter - no out of the mainstream ideology there! Since when did Dems NOT want to impose ideology on the country by using the bench???
double speak at its finest
accuse your adversary of doing exactly what you are doing.
point the finger at the innocent
while you slip the noose around
their neck.
got your 6
He is praising O'Connor for being the deciding vote in a case that assures that students from all backgrounds have access to a college education...
He seems tor remember that afftimative action case JUST a little different than I do...I don't think it has been in doubt for a very long time whether students of various backgrounds HAVE ACCESS to college educations....just whether certain students have MORE ACCESS than others based solely on the color of their skin..
Shaddup, loser!
they do not have an ideology
how could they possibly impose it on anyone?
what they want is whatever we don't
we are choosing the agenda
they are opposing it
or, put another way, their ideology (if you call it that) is anything different from what we have or want
cute
is that your squeeze?
The United States is the ONLY country in the world where ANYBODY who tries hard enough can go to college and money is readily available for people who can't afford it.
These damn Democrats have been doing everything in there power to circomvent the constitution.
Ried is two faced liar, like the terrorist's he represents.
Shoot, in Texas, even illegals can go to college easier than Americans from other states!!!
THAT is a crime!
. . . killing babies. And you'd better believe, we Death-o-crats want 'em dead, dead, dead!!!
It lives and breathes. THAT is the key phrase in all of this. Libs always tell us the constitution "lives and breathes".
What does that mean?
To libs it means the Constitution can be changed, altered or interpreted differently at different times, depending on the situation. In other words: Judicial activism rather than literal Constitutional interpretation.
Their entire constitutional philosophy in 4 little words.
They MUST constantly repeat that phrase as it 'verifies' some of the idiotic and un-constitutional decisions that seem to be coming more and more.
We need originalists on the SCOTUS and the Federal benches. We do not need those that believe the Constitution "lives and breathes".
"Death-o-cRATS"
where did you learn to spell?
sending this to Wikipedia for immediate posting.
thanks
counting all the money the casinos pay us, you know several of my children are on the take.
but,
if it does not "live and breathe" then it must be dead. what are we supposed to do with a dead Constitution?
call the paramedics and save it before its too late
Bush needs to appoint a Doctor/Lawyer to fill Sandra's seat
ooops, silly me,
Bush needs to appoint a Lesbian Doctor/Lawyer to fill Sandra's seat
/sarc>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.