If the Framer's intended the judiciary to have the final word over the Legislature why didn't they just spell out "Judicial Review" in The Constitution? Why were they so fearful of an out of control judiciary? Why did they limit the powers of the judiciary, and give Congress authority to limit their scope?
When you start answering these questions you get an idea of what the Framer's were afraid of, and why they concentrated power in the elected branches of government.
My interpretation of 'All Judicial Power' is Judicial review. It was Hamilton's as well. And Marshall's. And Scalia's. And Bork's.
In a system of checks and balances, NO branch has the final word.