Replies

I stated "IMHO, it is either a set up by terrorists and their supporters or very stupid arsonist. Occam's razor says that it was an inside job."

From that Parenthetical claims that I am one somehow included in his statement of "guys are disgusting!"

--- Sounds like a typical Liberal Dhimmicrat / CAIR response - "I can't refute the truth of your statement so I am going to attack you / claim victim status / declare you guilty by alleged association / declare that all moslems are peaceful"

As I stated in my post, based on the facts there are three potential catagories that the perps could be part of --
a) Terrorist (benefit = to provoke the "Bloomington Islamic Street", similarly to what was done at the other recent koran burning by moslems)
b) Terrorist Symp (benefit = as above & to claim victim status and to prove that Bloomington is racist & disgusting)
c) Non Islamic Arsonist. Two sub catagories here --
c1) Arsonist motivated against Islam (benefit = feels giving payback for 20 years of Islamic attacks on US & the Western Civilization)
c2) "Traditional" Arsonist (benefit = likes to burn things)

Given the facts stated in the article, I believe that the simpler explaination is that the person is from group a) or b). The fire was in the kitchen but no sign of forced entry. A burned koran on the front steps of the building, possibly where it could be seen by a 'passer by' who would call the fire dept before a large anount of damage occured.

If you have other facts, not included in the article, please supply.

Also, if you have logic that refutes my Occam's razor then please provide.

Paran said "Many of the people who study here (taught by the people you call terrorists)"

--- I did not call any student or teacher there a terrorist. Again Dhimicrat Playbook -- Fake a quote or a document.

Or are you saying that the teachers there do have terrorist links, but that I shouldn't call them that?

Paran claims that the student studying under the teachers mentioned above are there "so they can help in the War on Terror."

--- On which side?

Paran also says "The implication that Bloomington is a hotbed of radical Islam is absurd"

--- Your implication not mine. Again, fake a quote.

On the other hand, all of the WTC terrorists and the upper leadership of al-qaeda have been from well to do, college educated families.

Where better to hide out, then among those who look & sound like they do? Especially since it is forbidden to "profile".

Besides, college professors are typically less pro-American than the average citizen as documented by many polls from the MSM.

A hypothetical terrorist may think that a place with Concealment + Sympathizers is a good place to hang out until its 72 Virgins time.

Paranthetical also says "Do you think al Qaeda members would be training future (and current) CIA operatives? "

--- Yes.

The FBI has already been forced to undergo 'sensitivity' training.

Also, if you train the operative, you know who they are.

And baiter Paren says "Who's to say it's not people like you who did this?" (after a long list of alledged things, including protesting girls in shorts).

--- Typical.

I bet that you think that Al Gore really did win the election.

BTW, It depends on how the sorority girls look in their short shorts. There are some that I probably would protest about and others that I would give a "10" to.

Paren also laments "You're obviously filled with hate and racist ignorance. It really is too bad that there are people like you in this great country."

--- Not quite sure how you got from me saying that there were three groups of people who might have done the alledged arson to me being a hater & a racist, but then lgical thought is hard for some. It is typical though, for a Dhimmicrat to say that since 'you don't believe what I beleive, you are a racist / bigot / homophobe'

BTW, sticks & stones. Name calling is additional proof that you have limited thinking ability, class or knowledge.

Please elighten me though since I'm not sure when islamic became a race. Typically race is defined as something that cannot be changed -- skin color, eye folds, lack of melanin. Are you stating that belief in allah is a racial thing, something that cannot be changed due to physical appearance? Or something that cannot be changed due to thought process? I'm not sure what your claim of race status for islam means, please elaborate.

Or is your claim that islamics are a race apart just another way of saying don't ask them questions?

Also Parenthetical, I believe that this is a great country and that asking questions about a news report that does not make sense is part of what makes America great. Our ability and obligation to ask questions is part of what we should do. Since you are, seemingly, saying that I do not have the Constitutional right to say that, based on the facts presented to me, the report makes no sense, I have to ask if you really are an American?

Again, Parren, if you have facts not reported in the article, of have an alternative logic, then please post.