Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf; lilylangtree; Borges; John Robertson; gridlock; Sloth

The problem with this idea is as follows: The CJ is, essentially the Chief Administrator of the US court system and has additional duties beyond those of an Associate Justice:

If the Chief Justice is in the majority on a Supreme Court case, he or she may decide to write the Opinion of the Court, or may assign it to an associate justice of his or her choice.
Presides when the Senate tries impeachments of the President of the United States
Two Chief Justices, Salmon P. Chase and William Rehnquist, have had the duty of presiding over Presidential impeachments and trials--Chase in 1868 over the proceedings of President Andrew Johnson and Rehnquist in 1999 over the proceeding against Bill Clinton.
Presides over the impeachment trial of the Vice President if the Vice President is serving as Acting President (not a Constitutional responsibility but a rule of the Senate).
Officiates at the inauguration of the President of the United States. This is a traditional, not a constitutional, responsibility of the Chief Justice. All federal and state judges, as well as notaries public, are empowered by law to administer oaths and affirmations.
Serves as the Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution.
Serves as the head of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the chief administrative body of the U.S. federal courts. The Judicial Conference is empowered by the Rules Enabling Act to promulgate rules to ensure the smooth operation of the federal courts. Major portions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence have been adopted by most state legislatures and are considered canonical by American law schools.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Justice_of_the_United_States

That's a fair amount of power to give a "moderate."


33 posted on 07/08/2005 12:46:04 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines ("I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."--S. Townsley on Ithaca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines

Didn't think Judge Roy was a moderate. Thought he was a conservative. Or are you talking about Kennedy?


38 posted on 07/08/2005 12:48:27 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
That's a fair amount of power to give a "moderate."

Thanks for providing the list. I read it carefully, twice, and my position is unchanged, though. You consider these positions a fair amount of power? Ceremony and ensuring the smooth running of the courts are about it. I wouldn't blink twice if she became CJ while we got 2-3 conservative judges.

41 posted on 07/08/2005 12:50:06 PM PDT by Darkwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; PhiKapMom

Thank you, BLL. Good post.


72 posted on 07/08/2005 1:48:47 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson