Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Pig; lilylangtree; dubyaismypresident; Txsleuth; Borges; John Robertson; Sloth; gridlock; ...
I started a conversation at the National Review's Bench Memos blog. This is Ed Whelan's response to it. (I sent a slightly shortened version of this post as a letter to the editrice, Kathryn Lopez
105 posted on 07/08/2005 10:16:36 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

IMHO, Ed Whelan makes a point about sending Ginsburg up using the same logic as shown in my post. But,
1. that goes beyond credibility. It will SMELL like a political stunt;
2. As Behind Liberal Lines points out, the Chief Justice does get first crack at writing opinions whenever he is in the majority. For Kennedy, this means reiging in the left even when he sides with them; For ginsburg, it'll mean she becomes the wackiest left-winger becomes the voice of the majority whenever the majority tilts ever so slightly left.
3. I expect there to be another conservative added on, and so will Kennedy. Kennedy seems to like to be on a winnig team, and forsaking the right, only to be overpowered by a new majority, will impugn Kennedy's repuation. My bet is that he'd want to be seen as a poineer of the new majority, rather than vanquished by it.


109 posted on 07/08/2005 10:23:18 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
Speak of the devil.

We no longer like NR or NRO. Tell them to shape up.

Karl Keating on the Decline of the National Review and Other Matters

129 posted on 07/08/2005 11:17:31 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson