To: Chappaquiddick Crawdad
Read the word "may"? That is a problem for many on these threads, they can't read English.
Now if you are saying that GWB doesn't have the 'nads to do what many of us are calling for him to do in a situation of that premise, then just say so, if you aren't, then explain.
To: Final Authority
Read the word "may"? That is a problem for many on these threads, they can't read English.I can read English fine, thank you. Just because you qualified your fantastic statement with a modal auxiliary expressing likelihood doesn't diminish my point. There was never any possibility of such happening.
Now if you are saying that GWB doesn't have the 'nads to do what many of us are calling for him to do in a situation of that premise, then just say so, if you aren't, then explain.
Yet I should have thought my intention was obvious enough. Verbum sapienti satis est and all that, but maybe I overestimated your mental powers?
133 posted on
07/08/2005 1:06:06 PM PDT by
Chappaquiddick Crawdad
("E unum pluribus"? Perhaps you meant "ex uno plures", or is that "stultus sum"? hmmm...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson