Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pikamax
After almost two years, Fitzgerald finds only one person in jail as a result of his inquiry -- a reporter who never wrote an article about the leak. "

And what does the grand jury wish to hear from Miller? What a "specified government official" not only said about Plame, but Wilson's trip or what was said about Iraq attempting to obtain uranium.

5 posted on 07/08/2005 8:57:22 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper

I think this article finally removed any doubt for me. I've been worried for awhile now since I figured the downside to this turning out to be Rove was far worse than the possible upsides of it not being Rove. I've been reading your posts and others for awhile now and have been trying to get some confidence going and I'm finally there. This entire piece is about nothing. Hopefully we won't have to wait until October for more definitive info.


7 posted on 07/08/2005 9:04:44 AM PDT by Bogeygolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper
I think Fitzgerald would also still like to get Judith Miller in front of the grand jury to discuss who leaked the raid on the Islamic charity. I think this is why she is holding out.

My guess is that Fitzgerald has expanded his scope to leaking beyond the Plame affair.

I've been following your postings on this case and think your analysis is spot-on.

11 posted on 07/08/2005 9:16:01 AM PDT by robomurph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson