Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xmm0

Well, you and I read that differently. Post #23 sums up my feelings rather well.


26 posted on 07/08/2005 5:17:18 AM PDT by Roccus (The collective has started.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Roccus

I guess we are really just arguing symantics. My understanding between "want" and "need" is that you can live without a "want" but not a "need." So, by my definition it would be an elevation from want to need. But, by your statement you'd be stating you are quite eager to satisfy this need of ours. Well, I'm right with ya!


27 posted on 07/08/2005 5:22:33 AM PDT by xmm0 (This post has been brought to you by the letters "U," "S," and "A" and Amendment number 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson