To: icwhatudo
I read about this a week or two ago and was wondering why the MSM weren't reporting this good economic news. Then I remembered how they covered Warren Buffett extensively when he was betting against the dollar, and I saw one story about how that wasn't a good bet a few months later.
If this were news under the Clinton Presidency, the cover of Time would read "The New Boom!"
11 posted on
07/07/2005 3:51:39 PM PDT by
Dr.Hilarious
(If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
To: Dr.Hilarious
If Clinton were in there we would hear: the budget deficit will be eliminated in 6 years, no 8, no 12, no 7, no 9, no 10, no 8, etc.
13 posted on
07/07/2005 3:56:50 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: Dr.Hilarious
I read about this a week or two ago and was wondering why the MSM weren't reporting this good economic news. It's only partly good. The deficit should be going down because of decreases in spending, not increases in tax revenues.
24 posted on
07/07/2005 5:04:48 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson