Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gunrunner2

Not that I disagree with you, but when we dropped the two Atomic bombs on Japan weren't there innocent people in those two city's?


4,082 posted on 07/12/2005 3:24:09 AM PDT by stockpirate (We can fight the Muslum Army in Iraq! Or we can fight them outback! Which do you prefer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4070 | View Replies ]


To: stockpirate
There were. . .but the action was justified under the concept of "just war."

Just war permits this because of the rule of "proportionality."

This means the attack on Japan was allowed because the expected military gain was worth the expected civilian loss. Terror attacks aim to murder the innocent, not achieve a military gain. Terrorists intent to to harm the innocent, as that is their goal, whereas the attack on Japan had a military objective that was deemed to be proportionate when balanced against the expected civilian loss. It was not an attack with an evil aim, as is a terror attack.

Because it was anticipated that we would experience close to one million casualties if we invaded Japan, then the dropping of the bomb was justified. Just War by Tucker, Just and Unjust War by Walzer are excellent reads on the subject. Also, Just War Against Terror by Jean Bethke-Elshtain is timely and informative.
4,083 posted on 07/12/2005 3:48:00 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4082 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson