Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iam1ru1-2
OK Then we need to get Congress to negate Roe-v-Wade and quit expecting a President on our side to nominate an Activist to do it for Congress. If we did that, we would be no better than the Liberals. Laws are enacted and/or modified by Congress, so if we are going to live by the standards of Conservatism and the Original intent, We must lobby Congress, not appoint an activist
13 posted on 07/06/2005 9:25:20 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: MJY1288
On the contrary, acitivism it NOT reverting back to what the constitution originally intended. Activism is when you take the responsibilites given by the constitution from Legislative Branch to the Judicial Branch of Government. Righting an illegal act is not activism, it's justice.
33 posted on 07/06/2005 10:03:18 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson