Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bobdsmith

I should also have pointed out that algebra is math and not a "pure science"


56 posted on 07/07/2005 3:11:50 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: bobdsmith
"I should also have pointed out that algebra is math and not a pure science"

mathematics - n : a science (or group of related sciences) dealing with the logic of quantity and shape and arrangement

You are really showing your ignorance. You go around calling creationism unscientific and do not even know what true science is. Math is pure science.

That is why condescending, high and mighty, evolutionists are so offensive when they go around saying creationism in unscientific.

"Yes but this is the kind of faith that is fundamental to reasoning and logic. These things are assumptions which are necessary to perform basic logic itself. Anyone who reasons must have this faith and people use it in everyday life, whether to help them find their car keys or to figure out what happened to the TV reception. This is necessary faith. The faith in intelligent design is different as it is not a necessary to perform logic."

You cannot demonstrate that faith in God is less rational than the belief that the symmetric axiom of algebra is true (i.e. reflective of the way the real world operates). You also cannot demonstrate that the "kind" of faith is different.

Evolutionists do not have any consensus among them about the fundamental essential axioms that are needed for the theory to be true. For example, is time constant? Have the basic forces (gravity, elctro-magnetic, strong and weak) always existed in their present form? Are the laws of physics constant in all places in the universe and at all times in history? If so, does that necessitate that matter has always existed only in its present form?

This is just scratching the surface.

Evolution as adaptation is an observable phenomenon. However, the idea that all living creatures have a single common ancestor defies logic on the face of it. Common ancestry would imply that the genetic information (diversity) existed in simpler life forms in ancient history. This would lead one to believe that types of living organisms would be more numerous and diverse rather than fewer. Evolution proposes that life forms were both simpler and less diverse - an idea that is self-contradictory.
61 posted on 07/07/2005 7:53:40 AM PDT by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson