[johnnyb_61820]

"Well T.O has a good track record in calling myths, wheras the Creationists tend to be the ones generating them."

I'd disagree here. Especially if you classify statements which have simply been falsified by later research as myths, evolution would qualify as a major myth-generator here as well.

For reference, some creationists are working on a rebuttal page to T.O's pages, using T.O's numbering system for convenience:

http://www.nwcreation.net/wiki/index.php?title=Creationist_claims

Here is one which addresses T.O's Helium/Zyrcon response on it's index to Creationist Claims (though not directly some of the things on the FAQ page):

http://www.nwcreation.net/wiki/index.php?title=CD015

[bobdsmith]

For reference, some creationists are working on a rebuttal page to T.O's pages, using T.O's numbering system for convenience:

Thanks. I had a laugh at their attempts to defend the claim that the 2nd law of thermodynamics disproves evolution.