Posted on 07/06/2005 2:07:16 PM PDT by Irish_Thatcherite
Hat trick: how Bono finally got his stuff back
Ray Managh BONO got his pants back yesterday along with his Stetson hat, sweatshirt and earrings.
A judge ordered the U2 singers former stylist, Lola Cashman, to give back the items within the next seven days.
Circuit Court President, Mr Justice Matthew Deery, then told her also to hand over a special Christmas decoration, 88 Polaroid pictures and 117 other photographs of U2 members taken during their Joshua Tree world tour of the late 1980s.
Judge Deery said Ms Cashman had joined the band as stylist during the 1987-88 tour and had claimed the items in question had been gifted to her by Bono in particular and other members of the group.
U2 members Bono (Paul Hewson), Adam Clayton, David Evans and Laurence (Larry) Mullen had sought the return of all property belonging to the band after the items had appeared for sale in a Christies London auction of rock memorabilia.
U2, who are on their Vertigo Tour in Poland and were unable to attend yesterdays verdict, said that the point of principle involved was of much greater significance than any item of memorabilia.
Yesterday they issued a statement saying they were relieved that this matter has now concluded.
This case was brought very reluctantly, in the context of a larger dispute which we never invited, they said. The band also wished Ms Cashman well in the future.
U2s working wardrobe was housed back in Dublin and the band considered archiving of wardrobe items very seriously.
Bono had denied he had ever given any working wardrobe to any stylist.
Mr Hewson denied emphatically that he gave trousers and earrings to Ms Cashman but was not certain as to the sweatshirt and said he could have given it to her, Judge Deery said.
Bono had told the court the Stetson hat had taken on iconic status and giving it away would be tantamount to The Edge giving away one of his guitars. Nobody in the band remembered giving the Christmas decoration away.
Judge Deery said ttempt had been made to sell the items at Sothebys but the band had not known of this.
The group had sought to repossess the items prior to the publication of Ms Cashmans book, In the Zoo with U2, in 2003. Judge Deery said Ms Cashman claimed Bono had given her the trousers and sweatshirt at a time when she was clearing out a trunk.
I think it is highly unlikely the items were given in this way. The weight of the evidence is entirely against the defendants version of events, he said.
She had also claimed Bono had given her the Stetson hat on the last night of the Joshua Tree tour. Referring to evidence by Ms Cashman that Bono had been prancing about in his underpants at the time, Judge Deery said she had given a colourful description of the situation prevailing when the hat had been given to her.
The judge said there had been no such detail given by Ms Cashman in her replies to particulars sought by solicitors for U2 during the preparation of the case and equally there had been no such detail in her book in 2003. Ms Cashmans version about the giving of the hat is unlikely to have occurred, he said.
Judge Deery said he accepted there had been a strict protocol in relation to the bands working wardrobe and he did not believe the earrings had been given to her.
The court took the same view regarding the Christmas decoration. It was unlikely it had been given to Ms Cashman. He said Ms Cashman had retained the photographs and claimed they were her property.
He was satisfied from the evidence these photographs had come into existence as a result of Ms Cashmans employment with the band and the film used was purchased with money provided by U2. Judge Deery said it seemed to him that while the photographs had not been set out specifically in U2s claim they were undoubtedly the property of the band.
I am making an order directing the defendant to deliver up these items within a period of seven days from todays date, he said.
He added the matter of legal costs could be mentioned to the court in a weeks time.
Bono sues over a pair of trousers ping!
Has Monica's blue dress hit eBay yet?
Hmm...? It that dress still considered "evidence", and therefore in possession by the gov't? If so, is she reimbursed for the value of the dress (excluding DNA)?
Do I have to pay for the dry cleaning bill?
-PJ
"What are three things that don't go together, Alex?"
Careful, someone might steal them again...
I thought that flash in Bono's trousers was a nice touch.
"I can't believe the news today....."
Hmm...
Hey! I have a buddy I've known for many years and one day while I was visiting him he tells me he worked on the crew for Elvis. Back when Elvis was Elvis. I said "sure dude" and then he pulls out boxes of Elvis stuff. This guy has piles of photographs of Elvis and even some 16mm film. But I don't think Elvis wants it back. He's real dead too.
I don't got you on that, babe.
I didn't even know I was on the "stolen trousers" ping list!
This the Stolen Trousers Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on/off this ping list.
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list! < /taking the piss >
I was wondering when someone would see the irony of this!
"What are three things that don't go together, Alex?"
LOL!!! Best line of the day!
I'd really love to know what's behind all of this.
I'm guessing that there was a clause in her employment contract which prevented her from giving an exposé about the band while in their employment. Then she pissed them off by writing a book.
Obviously, the book didn't sell too well...why else would she be hocking Bono's hat?
Not like it was going to make her millions or anything. She must have hit hard times.
If I had the hat, I'd find it more valuable as a talking piece than anything else.
BTW...a U2 'stylist'? (That's almost an oxymoron in itself. Ferfuxsake, Bono's mullet? Stylist?)
BTW...as a DISCLAIMER, I will say...I am NOT a U2 fan any more (even though i like a couple of tracks on the Vertigo tour).
U2 and I parted company shortly after The Joshua Tree.
I think Bono should shut up and sing.
But Larry Mullen is still the hottest piece of ass in Rock 'n Roll! Phwaorrrr!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.