What would you suggest? And I didn't know I had a 'side'. I would just like to see a Constitutional argument based on facts. Not hyperbole and not baseless name calling of elected officials.
As I said, I think it's somewhat sad that the Florida Supreme Court decided as they did. But they did. And from a Constitutional standpoint that's where it should have stopped.
And so you have no problem with someone being starved to death by order of the state.
How nice.